Game Development: A Taste of Wheel

[Bowshot125]

Also, maslov, sheesh, take it easy man.

I can't take it easy, because no1 actually do what im doing. But because only im highend archer, so jorb nerfing only me. TT
I'll take B12 and will kill AD and shit next time. So probably latter B12 will be nerfed also
Seems Jorb don't know how to nerf me, he don't understand that even with bare hands i will kill everyfkingone

Hafen Bros, form of, Autism!

[Ozzy123]

I love maslow's salty posts, need more of them. His botted perception gone to waste.

xD I love how the guy botted all his stats, bots aiming and shooting and now he calls normal people "NEWBS" becouse jorb nerfed something that was too op.

[Kaios]

Just want to point out that a «subject whose Hearths are within the Realm» and «a citizen» are different terms but they are used in this patch-note like they are interchangable.
Subjects simply have a hearthfire inside the realm - they might have been covered forcefully. A citizen, however, has been willingly and purposefully sworn into the realm.

It would make sense that only citizens (=sworn in realm members) give double authority, since that would encourage to not only force claim over subjects but to really integrate them.

But I think in this case it's referring to citizens as those with hearthfires on the realm claim rather than those sworn in. So being on the claim and also having a hearthfire = double authority and being sworn in or not is irrelevant. That's how interpreted it.

[zebratul]

But I think in this case it's referring to citizens as those with hearthfires on the realm claim rather than those sworn in.

Yeah, that's how i understood the OP post too. Which is kinda wrong.

[Ysh]

Just want to point out that a «subject whose Hearths are within the Realm» and «a citizen» are different terms but they are used in this patch-note like they are interchangable.
Subjects simply have a hearthfire inside the realm - they might have been covered forcefully. A citizen, however, has been willingly and purposefully sworn into the realm.

It would make sense that only citizens (=sworn in realm members) give double authority, since that would encourage to not only force claim over subjects but to really integrate them.

But I think in this case it's referring to citizens as those with hearthfires on the realm claim rather than those sworn in. So being on the claim and also having a hearthfire = double authority and being sworn in or not is irrelevant. That's how interpreted it.

How you interpret it I think is correct, sworn in is no relevant right now. Granger think this should not be how it is and sworn in should be require for double bonus.

[Kaios]

Yeah, that's how i understood the OP post too. Which is kinda wrong.

Well the way I see it the player being on the claim to feed the authority is how it should have been initially kept in the first place. When they changed it to hearthfire on the claim to feed the authority this only gave further incentive to Kingdom owners to extend in the tentacle fashion to the most active villages so I think without the hearthfire aspect to it the mechanics would likely be better for it.

But with that said, allowing the realm to be fed through players who can be oathed and not actually be on the claim in some sense is a worse option in my opinion.

[SacreDoom]

More meat pies made from meats that Azrid didn't post.



Has anyone made one from troll meat yet? I'd like to see that.

[Mafious]

Yeah, that's how i understood the OP post too. Which is kinda wrong.

Well the way I see it the player being on the claim to feed the authority is how it should have been initially kept in the first place. When they changed it to hearthfire on the claim to feed the authority this only gave further incentive to Kingdom owners to extend in the tentacle fashion to the most active villages so I think without the hearthfire aspect to it the mechanics would likely be better for it.

But with that said, allowing the realm to be fed through players who can be oathed and not actually be on the claim in some sense is a worse option in my opinion.

but thats cool why would you want to be king of wastelands and deserts, kingdoms should try to dominate areas of interest.

[Kaios]

but thats cool why would you want to be king of wastelands and deserts, kingdoms should try to dominate areas of interest.

I agree and hotzones of activity should still be important but the way it worked previously gave zero benefit to claiming any area at all that has little to no hearthfires on it regardless of the amount of traffic through such an area which doesn't seem like the way it should work to me either.

[Redlaw]

The different Rabbit Foods we can now make.