Berserker buff for ganked players

[iamahh]

seeing all these 3v1, 5v1 situations

If you're being attacked by more than 1 player you get a Berserker buff, proportional to enemy numbers, enough to make the gankers think twice

[shubla]

If there are more attackers than defenders. Attackers should have the advantage.
But then again, its difficult to always move in large groups if you go hunting/foraging or similar.

[infectedking]

what if the group of players doingthe ganking all aggro eachother before going to fight so they all recieve the berserker buff... I don't think it's be a good idea.

[iamahh]

if you attack a Berseked player you lose the Bersek buff you may have?

[infectedking]

if you attack a Berseked player you lose the Bersek buff you may have?

so they all aggro 1 of their people, then he initiates the combat, then rest aggro the target, then you're fighting like 4normal people and 1 beserk VS 1 beserk

[Ozzy123]

if you attack a Berseked player you lose the Bersek buff you may have?

Still, if there is 10 gankers they can all get the buff for 1 of them and it will be op. Anyways, the defender shouldnt get any buff if he is being outnumbered, he should look for more friends or don't leave walls of his village.

[iamahh]

meh, there's probably a way to check if you're in a 1 vs 2+ situation

fuck gankers, it doesnt mean Berseked would win, but it would give a chance

it would add fear to everyone, not only the ganked guy

[sMartins]

what if a group of noobs/farmers/etc...want to defend themself togethere against one single guy with higher stats that is stalking them?
Nope...more people = more damage, also incentive to play togethere that is fine. Maybe when 1 guy got KOed or killed by more people the scents should last longer and easier to track...lets say 3 people killed one guy, scents 3 times easier to find and will last 3 time longer. pretty straight forward.

[iamahh]

the scent idea is nice

Berseker buff still could only happen if the stats meet a certain criteria, so the noob situation could be detected, but i know this has little chance to be implemented

[jorb]

Strange incentives to manipulate this.