Pay for unban.Ysh wrote:Monetize forum game. Custom name color. Badge or whatever. Paid emoticons. Subscription only boards.
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Alternatives to pay to win
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
shadyg0d
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 4:08 pm
Re: Alternatives to pay to win
I think I belong to the latter category.wolf1000wolf wrote:Question for you:
If you're playing casually, why would you care that other players are going to be "better" than you?
If you're loving this game and devoting many hours a day, don't you think this game is worth the $15 one time fee and $7/month sub?
Paying to be "better" in a competitive game doesn't feel right, nor does playing against players who paid to be better. -Especially- in a game like haven, where permadeath is a thing and the events/interactions that happen become "historical" in a sense. What happens actually MATTERS, significantly, to the dedicated player. When unfair advantages are mixed in it reduces the impact and meaning of everything that happens, and one can only question what was truly to blame for the outcome. How do we know who was better? Who did something miraculous and overcame great odds to achieve something? You can say "but it's just a game". To me it's not "just a game", and that's what makes haven special. Yes, it is a game, but if it were -just- a game I would go play something else. People who truly love this game play it for an experience that impacts them deeply.
But there's really no need for me to explain this. If the payment system doesn't bother you then this thread is not for you. I know I'm not the only one who feels this way though.
I will say that I'd be happy to pay $15 dollars and a $7/month sub if it were required to play the game(pay to play). Unfair advantages are not an incentive to me and they actually discourage me from wanting to support the game. Not only does this system hurt the game but it makes my achievements feel meaningless. Paying for it would would support the game but it would also cast a vote that the current payment system is fine with me. And not only do I not want to pay for unfair advantages, I don't want to play for free either, because my experience could be ruined unfairly by those who paid. Lose/lose for me...
The problem is that there isn't a level playing field and IMO it lessons the integrity of the game. Some people are OK with this but many people are not. I'm just trying to keep this on topic because these threads often turn into a debate about whether said game is pay to win and what the definition of "pay to win" is. The bottom line is that unfair advantages can be bought with RL money and that is the point of this thread, no matter what "pay to win" actually means.loftar wrote:It's a bit hard to reason about a solution without being allowed to ask what the problem is.shadyg0d wrote:This thread is not for debating what "pay to win" means or if haven is pay to win.
And this debate I wanted to avoid is EXACTLY what this thread is now turning into.
-
Ysh
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:43 am
- Location: Chatting some friends on forum
Re: Alternatives to pay to win
Granger can be a profit generator overnight.loftar wrote:Pay for unban.Ysh wrote:Monetize forum game. Custom name color. Badge or whatever. Paid emoticons. Subscription only boards.
I have become victory of very nice Jordan Coles Contest! Enjoy my winning submit here if it pleasures you.Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Alternatives to pay to win
25% royalties to the mod who issued the ban. ^^Ysh wrote:Granger can be a profit generator overnight. ;)
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: Alternatives to pay to win
$10loftar wrote:Pay for unban.Ysh wrote:Monetize forum game. Custom name color. Badge or whatever. Paid emoticons. Subscription only boards.
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Alternatives to pay to win
You haven't even explained what part of the payment model you think makes it pay-to-win, though.shadyg0d wrote:And this debate I wanted to avoid is EXACTLY what this thread is now turning into.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: Alternatives to pay to win
the advantages given to paying players, assumably
-
Divicid
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: Alternatives to pay to win
Well if you want to be competitive, then pay for the game.
Don't buy that Happy Meal at Mcdonalds, or take that extra beer when you at the bar. It's not expensive.
Seriously, how long has the devs been developing this game? I wish they could support themselves on Haven & Hearth, with a proper playerbase, and a profitable subscription plan. Then we might be able to see more devotion and time spent on making this a great game.
But apparently, some people don't think it's worth throwing them 7$ for a game they have developed for years. That is too much.
Just to be clear, if you are not paying for this game, then you have no right what so ever to complain. You are simply leeching of an incredible dedication for a game, driven by passion without any real meaning of being profitable.
Both Jorb and Loftar deserves that extra coin in their pocket for taking time to make this such a great game.
Don't buy that Happy Meal at Mcdonalds, or take that extra beer when you at the bar. It's not expensive.
Seriously, how long has the devs been developing this game? I wish they could support themselves on Haven & Hearth, with a proper playerbase, and a profitable subscription plan. Then we might be able to see more devotion and time spent on making this a great game.
But apparently, some people don't think it's worth throwing them 7$ for a game they have developed for years. That is too much.
Just to be clear, if you are not paying for this game, then you have no right what so ever to complain. You are simply leeching of an incredible dedication for a game, driven by passion without any real meaning of being profitable.
Both Jorb and Loftar deserves that extra coin in their pocket for taking time to make this such a great game.
-
2d0x
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 4:09 am
- Location: Russia
Re: Alternatives to pay to win
Rightly; a damn good question.wolf1000wolf wrote: If you're playing casually, why would you care that other players are going to be "better" than you?
Excuse me, I don't speak English.
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Alternatives to pay to win
Presumably, but I'm not sure if he's referring to verification/subscriptions, or only to subtokens, or perhaps to the mad advantage that can be had by wearing the Cat Hat.sabinati wrote:the advantages given to paying players, assumably
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike