Need more EXP

[tyrtix]

for a game design point, this system is working very well: it does not prevent the thing at all, so it's not a negation of the action, but it discourage it, and makes the player need to choose what to do: tedious tasks for getting advantages, or play w/o tedium but get a bit less.

[Pinkie-Pie]

How are people not getting enough exp events? Are you just super unlucky? Or are you using the spells a lot more then I am?

[Headchef]

Suggestion within this thread:

Keep current xp system.

Aside of that add that animals give XP instead of LP but this does not contribute to realm authority and cannot be used on spells (study only).

Would make it WAY less tedious in my opinion.

What do you guys think?

[brogamernz]

The fact is, no matter what people are going to be using alts to gain an advantage.. but when you hermit and don't have a big group you need alts and will use them anyway without a doubt, but having to maintain a village. farm, plant, feed animals, cheese, build, chop trees, smelt, mine, hunt, forage, craft. all these things add up and people who have lives and shit who cant play 8+ hours a day or a whole weekend.. need to do essential things to keep the village going. running around trying to discover random events for exp is rubbish.. so it stops alt farming..?? wrong.. alts are made and used no matter what. I'm just saying give us exp when killing animals not learning points.. because travelling around for hours and hours looking for exp and getting hunger reduction is a butt hurt. just one mans opinion..

[blank]

Suggestion within this thread:

Keep current xp system.

Aside of that add that animals give XP instead of LP but this does not contribute to realm authority and cannot be used on spells (study only).

Would make it WAY less tedious in my opinion.

What do you guys think?

yes. please consider

[jorb]

You can run quests if you really need XP, and otherwise it is indeed precisely intended to be obscure and problematic, especially if you don't play much.