I don't even have anything with bluetoothshubla wrote:If somebody uses bluetooth he clearly does not care about security.
P.S. Now i'thinking about it, why is it called Blue Tooth? lol What did they eat?
I don't even have anything with bluetoothshubla wrote:If somebody uses bluetooth he clearly does not care about security.
Depends, while operating a car it can be a good plan (or even mandated by law) to link your phone with the car (hands free speaker, call control located on the wheel).shubla wrote:If somebody uses bluetooth he clearly does not care about security.
Well i think that the security level of WPA2 is very high .... but everything is possibleblank wrote:next they will be hacking us through Wifi XD lol
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=how+did+bluetooth+get+its+namesMartins wrote:I don't even have anything with bluetoothshubla wrote:If somebody uses bluetooth he clearly does not care about security.
P.S. Now i'thinking about it, why is it called Blue Tooth? lol What did they eat?
Go dredge the dark web for a bit, and i'm sure you will find a few. Of course, a lot depends on the implementation of the security protocols used (and using them) and other software and firmware the router uses. Some of the el cheapo routers can be cracked like a peanut, others are more like cracking into the government agencies... doable, but likely to be noticed (and thus stopped) by an active observer.sMartins wrote:Well i think that the security level of WPA2 is very high .... but everything is possibleblank wrote:next they will be hacking us through Wifi XD lol
sMartins wrote:P.S. Now i'thinking about it, why is it called Blue Tooth? lol What did they eat?






Why you so boring recently? Just typing it i noticed its meaning ... never thought at that before ...MagicManICT wrote:http://lmgtfy.com/?q=how+did+bluetooth+get+its+namesMartins wrote:
P.S. Now i'thinking about it, why is it called Blue Tooth? lol What did they eat?
ehehDDDsDD999 wrote:
Why not, though? I don't think there's any particular reason why Bluetooth can't be secure. The authors of the Blueborne whitepaper seem to argue that it's overly complex and therefore lends itself to poor implementation, but nevertheless I don't think there are any intrinsic security issues with the spec as such.shubla wrote:If somebody uses bluetooth he clearly does not care about security.