Game Development: Flagging Butcher

[Redlaw]

Now all thats needed is a emote with a crotch grab and people can go all MJ when they kill people for picks.

[DDDsDD999]

If you dab twice in a row, the dab emote should alternate hands. This could be locked behind skills or have an EXP cost.

Extending off of that, a legendary triple dab could be added that requires rare dungeon items. The sky's the limit here.

[jorb]

Now all thats needed is a emote with a crotch grab and people can go all MJ when they kill people for picks.

Will consider.

[dafels]

AHHHHHHYESS DAB EMOTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE OMGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

[ricky]

accurate representation of the hearthlands:

[Myrgard]

very sad about the collapsed mine tiles and gems, it was such a fun feature.

So the beavers will still spawn in unlimited numbers, it really breaks roleplay as a creature that is somewhat rare in the wilds happens to dwell in literal hordes...

also the new necklace made from 8 dried wings is actually worse lp/hour wise than 1 fresh wing, are you sure you didn't loose a 0 somewhere in there?

[jordancoles]

Welp, looks like you fucked my kingdom claim with the realm overlap patch

Why not give the buff of the dominant realm rather than none at all?

[sMartins]

let us know where you'd like to see us spending time!

Seasons and/or polishing to me ....

[loftar]

Welp, looks like you fucked my kingdom claim with the realm overlap patch

Why not give the buff of the dominant realm rather than none at all?

The "none at all" option was already in effect for the area-based bonuses on crops and similar things, so I figured this was the consistent option. I also figured it might just be a good thing if conflicting realms is a bad thing that you don't want to keep around indefinitely because it provides weird and unintended buffs.

[jorb]

Why not give the buff of the dominant realm rather than none at all?

The game has no concept of dominant realms -- more authority? -- and this was consistent with established patterns. I do have to feel that overlapping claims should be discincentivized.