you act like people need a solid reason to siege someone in this game, we could siege someone because we just wanted to take their shit. there isnt any salt behind it xd and if personally insulting someone is more polite to you than someone randomly killing your character in a game that allows it im not sure what to think! we just found him annoying and wanted to put him in his place and dedicating a weekend to do it is easy enough. his kingdom wouldnt even have been lost if he handed over the crown, the guy we proposed he give it to wasnt even in our group or AD the guy was actually oathed to NK even. they would rather lose all their buffs which mostly benefit the nabs in the kingdom then just give up king haha nice kingdom btw great leadersAnts wrote: 1.You really shouldn't get salty over getting called an idiot or a loser in an online game. Usually the insults that are thrown around are much more aggressive and if you attacked first, well, it's not surprising that he would strike back. Calling you a tard is more polite than killing your character, imo.
2.By merit, do you mean brute strength? Big fists isn't what makes someone a good king.
3.He probably doesn't want to hand over the crown because he's emotional over the loss of the kingdom. That's not surprising.
I didn't really know him, but I can't shake the impression that people are blowing his "crimes" way, waaaaaaay out of proportion.
-
ChildhoodObesity
- Posts: 4165
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:16 am
Re: warning to the northern kingdom (aurora)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MZIg3c ... e=youtu.be <----- (me) (hatguy) (PART2)
-
Havion
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:02 am
Re: warning to the northern kingdom (aurora)
1. I am only "salty" if I get called names by people I actually respect. It is not being offended that made me want to help destroy Aurora, it's just pure disrespect toward the leader. Calling people names when they kill you in a game is some of the most childish behavior I've seen on Haven and that's saying something considering I've played it for a good 7 years now.Ants wrote:1.You really shouldn't get salty over getting called an idiot or a loser in an online game. Usually the insults that are thrown around are much more aggressive and if you attacked first, well, it's not surprising that he would strike back. Calling you a tard is more polite than killing your character, imo.
2.By merit, do you mean brute strength? Big fists isn't what makes someone a good king.
3.He probably doesn't want to hand over the crown because he's emotional over the loss of the kingdom. That's not surprising.
I didn't really know him, but I can't shake the impression that people are blowing his "crimes" way, waaaaaaay out of proportion.
2. By merit I mean everything it takes to make a good faction leader. He poses as a king, but in reality he makes the worst political decisions, assigns a complete retard as a leader of his "army" which is a group of people who, even when outstatting and outnumbering you, they will run away if you attack them, he used his FnI allies to defend Aurora in the last moments while none of his own players were defending, he'd rather the kingdom destroyed than someone else getting the crown, etc. Literally nothing he does makes him a good "king", the positive side is that he makes creative, pretty villages. Do kings only make pretty villages?
3. I'm far from surprised, he's exactly the type of person that would screw over the entire population of a realm because he's butthurt about his larp paradise being broken.
Last edited by Havion on Mon Feb 05, 2018 1:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Adder1234
- Posts: 636
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 11:16 am
- Location: Australia
Re: warning to the northern kingdom (aurora)
"We attacked them because we wanted to. Now let me explain all of the reasons why we did it."ChildhoodObesity wrote:you act like people need a solid reason to siege someone in this game, we could siege someone because we just wanted to take their shit. there isnt any salt behind it xd and if personally insulting someone is more polite to you than someone randomly killing your character in a game that allows it im not sure what to think! we just found him annoying and wanted to put him in his place and dedicating a weekend to do it is easy enough. his kingdom wouldnt even have been lost if he handed over the crown, the guy we proposed he give it to wasnt even in our group or AD the guy was actually oathed to NK even. they would rather lose all their buffs which mostly benefit the nabs in the kingdom then just give up king haha nice kingdom btw great leaders
-
Havion
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:02 am
Re: warning to the northern kingdom (aurora)
more like "we attacked them not because we're salty, but because [reasons]". not sure what you're getting at.Adder1234 wrote:"We attacked them because we wanted to. Now let me explain all of the reasons why we did it."ChildhoodObesity wrote:you act like people need a solid reason to siege someone in this game, we could siege someone because we just wanted to take their shit. there isnt any salt behind it xd and if personally insulting someone is more polite to you than someone randomly killing your character in a game that allows it im not sure what to think! we just found him annoying and wanted to put him in his place and dedicating a weekend to do it is easy enough. his kingdom wouldnt even have been lost if he handed over the crown, the guy we proposed he give it to wasnt even in our group or AD the guy was actually oathed to NK even. they would rather lose all their buffs which mostly benefit the nabs in the kingdom then just give up king haha nice kingdom btw great leaders
-
ChildhoodObesity
- Posts: 4165
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:16 am
Re: warning to the northern kingdom (aurora)
i said you act like we need a reason to not that we didnt have one smhingAdder1234 wrote:"We attacked them because we wanted to. Now let me explain all of the reasons why we did it."ChildhoodObesity wrote:you act like people need a solid reason to siege someone in this game, we could siege someone because we just wanted to take their shit. there isnt any salt behind it xd and if personally insulting someone is more polite to you than someone randomly killing your character in a game that allows it im not sure what to think! we just found him annoying and wanted to put him in his place and dedicating a weekend to do it is easy enough. his kingdom wouldnt even have been lost if he handed over the crown, the guy we proposed he give it to wasnt even in our group or AD the guy was actually oathed to NK even. they would rather lose all their buffs which mostly benefit the nabs in the kingdom then just give up king haha nice kingdom btw great leaders
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MZIg3c ... e=youtu.be <----- (me) (hatguy) (PART2)
-
Potjeh
- Posts: 11825
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: warning to the northern kingdom (aurora)
Trollex you teamed up with Frosty, sorry but you're automatically a tard by association.
-
ChildhoodObesity
- Posts: 4165
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:16 am
Re: warning to the northern kingdom (aurora)
hey!!! just a one time thing!!! temporary tard!Potjeh wrote:Trollex you teamed up with Frosty, sorry but you're automatically a tard by association.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MZIg3c ... e=youtu.be <----- (me) (hatguy) (PART2)
-
mgmmads
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:35 pm
Re: warning to the northern kingdom (aurora)
"We destroy buff, it's dani fault". Every time something is said it contradicts the previous statement. "We are only doing this to get a hit on dani", -> "Now we are destroy buffs" -> "we only raid because we can" -> "He deserved it". -> Draws swastika on the ground -> "it's just a game" -> posts pictures from real life -> uses wrapped logic as an excuse to justify behavior -> "There's no reason to justify behavior in a game". o.OChildhoodObesity wrote:you act like people need a solid reason to siege someone in this game, we could siege someone because we just wanted to take their shit. there isnt any salt behind it xd and if personally insulting someone is more polite to you than someone randomly killing your character in a game that allows it im not sure what to think! we just found him annoying and wanted to put him in his place and dedicating a weekend to do it is easy enough. his kingdom wouldnt even have been lost if he handed over the crown, the guy we proposed he give it to wasnt even in our group or AD the guy was actually oathed to NK even. they would rather lose all their buffs which mostly benefit the nabs in the kingdom then just give up king haha nice kingdom btw great leadersAnts wrote: 1.You really shouldn't get salty over getting called an idiot or a loser in an online game. Usually the insults that are thrown around are much more aggressive and if you attacked first, well, it's not surprising that he would strike back. Calling you a tard is more polite than killing your character, imo.
2.By merit, do you mean brute strength? Big fists isn't what makes someone a good king.
3.He probably doesn't want to hand over the crown because he's emotional over the loss of the kingdom. That's not surprising.
I didn't really know him, but I can't shake the impression that people are blowing his "crimes" way, waaaaaaay out of proportion.
Just let the events sink in for a second.
Not saying raiding and hating on someone in a game is wrong, it's part of gaming after all. But the second people drag it outside of a game and post pictures from real life, and start screaming "pedophile", "rapist" at someone for 18 hours... It just gets sad and ruins the fun for everyone. =/
“We, the unwilling, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful." - Konstantin Jireček
-
Havion
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:02 am
Re: warning to the northern kingdom (aurora)
We didn't destroy buffs though. We sieged the kingdom and demanded he give the crown OR we destroy the whole kingdom(and thus the buffs) (if we don't, he can just remake the kingdom idol and gain back kingship). Look at it this way: We are warring the Japanese and warned them to give up as we're obviously much more powerful, if they don't give up we drop the nuke.mgmmads wrote:"We destroy buff, it's dani fault". Every time something is said it contradicts the previous statement. "We are only doing this to get a hit on dani", -> "Now we are destroy buffs" -> "we only raid because we can" -> "He deserved it". -> Draws swastika on the ground -> "it's just a game" -> posts pictures from real life -> uses wrapped logic as an excuse to justify behavior -> "There's no reason to justify behavior in a game". o.O
Just let the events sink in for a second.
Not saying raiding and hating on someone in a game is wrong, it's part of gaming after all. But the second people drag it outside of a game and start screaming "pedophile", "rapist" at someone for 16 hours... It just gets sad and ruins the fun for everyone. =/
Nobody said "we raid because we can". Troll said "we don't need a reason (salt being referenced) to raid, but matter of fact we do have one, it's to put dani in his place"
Nobody except Frost condones putting people's IRL pics into videos.
Again, "it's a game and you can do things without a reason, but hey, we do have a reason".
Pedophile and rapist is claimed by Frosty and the like, again, not by actual respresentatives of either group attacking.
Last edited by Havion on Mon Feb 05, 2018 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
ven
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:17 am
Re: warning to the northern kingdom (aurora)
Not sure what's going on and that's pretty much how I read it, yeah.mgmmads wrote:"We destroy buff, it's dani fault". Every time something is said it contradicts the previous statement. "We are only doing this to get a hit on dani", -> "Now we are destroy buffs" -> "we only raid because we can" -> "He deserved it". -> Draws swastika on the ground -> "it's just a game" -> posts pictures from real life -> uses wrapped logic as an excuse to justify behavior -> "There's no reason to justify behavior in a game". o.O
Venator