Faster decay for trails

[shubla]

There are too many trails around, even though they have been abandoned a long time ago. Its ugly and annoying when there are trail signs everywhere.

[Fierce_Deity]

Trails that are not considered claimed or owned should prob decay faster. Wood ones at least. +1

[Massa]

Non-claimed and authority-less trails, yes. No for regular, active, claimed trails.

Trails are awful for a singular reason: Noobs need to build.

[itworkss]

This kinda goes in with the decay issue, if a zone isn't regularly being loaded, the trail won't decay. Even if it's not claimed.

I think roads need a reworking, all together.

[jorb]

I think roads need a reworking, all together.

He says, leaving no clue as to how he'd prefer it working.

I think roads work fine, and I don't mind them being in the landscapes none too much either.

[Granger]

I think roads need a reworking, all together.

He says, leaving no clue as to how he'd prefer it working.

I think roads work fine, and I don't mind them being in the landscapes none too much either.

I don't think roads work fine, so here is a clue how I would prefer them to work.