That specific case, iirc, had merit though: serving coffee that can give 3rd degree burns in <10 seconds in unstable containers and the victim that only went to court to get the medical bill covered and the final verdict factored in the 700+ people injured prior (of which McDonald's knew about - and did nothing). The media reported it as being fraudulent though, including plenty of wrong statements and painting her as a gold digger...Robben_DuMarsch wrote:It's like suing McDonald's for their hot coffee on steroids.
Nice. Moral based law where the damage is purely in the eye of the beholder, what can possibly go wrong?"[W]hoever, being of the age of 18 years and upwards, by any act corrupts or tends to corrupt the morals of any minor less than 18 years of age . . . commits a misdemeanor of the first degree."
I'm sure there are some creative ways to mess with people in it.
