Game Dev. Critique: World Pace

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!
ctopolon3
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:22 am

Re: Game Dev. Critique: World Pace

Post by ctopolon3 »

i love to play click\idle games. and i dont play them without autoclicker soft. some games are so balanced that there is better to go idle way instead click with autocliker. most of that kind of games just limit max clicks u can do (10cl\Sec) so autoclicker soft just gives you a slight advantage against manual clicker players...
ClickerHeroes \ RealmGrinder \ CrusadersLostIdols
User avatar
NOOBY93
Posts: 6528
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:12 pm

Re: Game Dev. Critique: World Pace

Post by NOOBY93 »

ctopolon3 wrote:i love to play click\idle games. and i dont play them without autoclicker soft. some games are so balanced that there is better to go idle way instead click with autocliker. most of that kind of games just limit max clicks u can do (10cl\Sec) so autoclicker soft just gives you a slight advantage against manual clicker players...
ClickerHeroes \ RealmGrinder \ CrusadersLostIdols
Congrats!
Jalpha wrote:I believe in my interpretation of things.
ctopolon3
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:22 am

Re: Game Dev. Critique: World Pace

Post by ctopolon3 »

im just tried to say that if here is no way to defeat sidesoft : make limit for that and make idle way more profitless
User avatar
Robben_DuMarsch
Posts: 2646
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:58 am

Re: Game Dev. Critique: World Pace

Post by Robben_DuMarsch »

LadyGoo wrote: As the researchers discovered, people feel excited about the future shiny thingies
I believe I read this, it was the Oxford study, right?
"Future Shiny Thingies: A Comparative Review"

Return to “Critique & Ideas”