Mario_Demorez wrote:jorb, why exactly did you post an announcement for an announcement?
viewtopic.php?f=39&t=62689&start=70#p795727
Mario_Demorez wrote:jorb, why exactly did you post an announcement for an announcement?
This is really funny statement.Uriel wrote:Jorb, large fraction of players is on hype train involving new world. Please give us some kind of statment about Your decision. In curent state of affairs, we really don't know if to invest time in curent world.
the cup is half fullTeilur wrote:This is really funny statement.Uriel wrote:Jorb, large fraction of players is on hype train involving new world. Please give us some kind of statment about Your decision. In curent state of affairs, we really don't know if to invest time in curent world.
If this "large fraction" is top players, then when they won't invest their time in the game anymore, all others will be able to easyly cath up and climb to the top. And this essentially removes the need in new world.
And if that "large fraction" is truly large faction of irrelevant no-names, then new world won't ever solve any of their problems and if they suddenly quit current world, noone would ever notice their leave nor will they make any tangible impact on current world.
Anyway, wipe will not solve any problem in the game. There will be a short turmoil in the beginning and in three or four months world 11 will be exactly as world 10 just with lower q.
The cup is too big.rhzk wrote:cup is half full
You obviously don't know our 1%ers. Nearly all have been around for multiple worlds, some of which have ran for 2+ years, others that have ran for six months (or less). Unfortunately, nobody really says who our 1%ers are, but looking at trade, and who "survives" the inevitable cataclysm, you figure it out.Teilur wrote:f this "large fraction" is top players, then when they won't invest their time in the game anymore, all others will be able to easyly cath up and climb to the top. And this essentially removes the need in new world.
Cptn Obvious asked me to underline that 1%ers cannot be "large fraction" by definition. But, as of my own previous experience, "large fraction of players" usually means "me, my alt and that guy from the forums I never met ingame."MagicManICT wrote:You obviously don't know our 1%ers. Nearly all have been around for multiple worlds, some of which have ran for 2+ years, others that have ran for six months (or less). Unfortunately, nobody really says who our 1%ers are, but looking at trade, and who "survives" the inevitable cataclysm, you figure it out.Teilur wrote:f this "large fraction" is top players, then when they won't invest their time in the game anymore, all others will be able to easyly cath up and climb to the top. And this essentially removes the need in new world.
This dev harassment is bad for the game. The new world will come when it's ready.Uriel wrote:Jorb, large fraction of players is on hype train involving new world. Please give us some kind of statment about Your decision. In curent state of affairs, we really don't know if to invest time in curent world.