Can we have fishing nets affected by our permissions, essentially functioning like a personal claim?
Issue: Personal Claims for Fishing Nets are clumsy and inconvenient.
Proposed Solution: Add a Fishing Net setting for colors/permissions set by the placer.
After 36 hours the fishing net will not be protected and can be removed by anyone. Prior to those 36 hours removal of the fishing net will be considered a "theft" crime.
-
Lunarius_Haberdash
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:14 am
Fishing Net Claims - A Solution
jorb: I don't want *your* money. You are rude and boring. Go away.
Sevenless: We already know real life has some pretty shitty game mechanics, it's why we're here instead.
Avu: The end is near it has finally come to pass: I agree with Lunarius...
Shubla: There are also other reasons to play this game than to maximize your stat gain.
Sevenless: We already know real life has some pretty shitty game mechanics, it's why we're here instead.
Avu: The end is near it has finally come to pass: I agree with Lunarius...
Shubla: There are also other reasons to play this game than to maximize your stat gain.
-
Ysh
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:43 am
- Location: Chatting some friends on forum
Re: Fishing Net Claims - A Solution
I think it will be irritating when the men block rivers with them and you can already build claim and extend it into the waters. This do not seem needed to me.Lunarius_Haberdash wrote:Can we have fishing nets affected by our permissions, essentially functioning like a personal claim?
Issue: Personal Claims for Fishing Nets are clumsy and inconvenient.
Proposed Solution: Add a Fishing Net setting for colors/permissions set by the placer.
After 36 hours the fishing net will not be protected and can be removed by anyone. Prior to those 36 hours removal of the fishing net will be considered a "theft" crime.
I have become victory of very nice Jordan Coles Contest! Enjoy my winning submit here if it pleasures you.Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.
-
dageir
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 12:37 pm
Re: Fishing Net Claims - A Solution
But it is ok for women to do it?Ysh wrote:I think it will be irritating when the men block rivers with them and you can already build claim and extend it into the waters. This do not seem needed to me.Lunarius_Haberdash wrote:Can we have fishing nets affected by our permissions, essentially functioning like a personal claim?
Issue: Personal Claims for Fishing Nets are clumsy and inconvenient.
Proposed Solution: Add a Fishing Net setting for colors/permissions set by the placer.
After 36 hours the fishing net will not be protected and can be removed by anyone. Prior to those 36 hours removal of the fishing net will be considered a "theft" crime.

-
Ysh
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:43 am
- Location: Chatting some friends on forum
Re: Fishing Net Claims - A Solution
What you are trying to ask?dageir wrote:But it is ok for women to do it?Ysh wrote:I think it will be irritating when the men block rivers with them and you can already build claim and extend it into the waters. This do not seem needed to me.Lunarius_Haberdash wrote:Can we have fishing nets affected by our permissions, essentially functioning like a personal claim?
Issue: Personal Claims for Fishing Nets are clumsy and inconvenient.
Proposed Solution: Add a Fishing Net setting for colors/permissions set by the placer.
After 36 hours the fishing net will not be protected and can be removed by anyone. Prior to those 36 hours removal of the fishing net will be considered a "theft" crime.
I have become victory of very nice Jordan Coles Contest! Enjoy my winning submit here if it pleasures you.Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.
-
iamahh
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 8:23 pm
Re: Fishing Net Claims - A Solution
or let us hide it in cattail
so people would have to collect all cattail to find your net
so people would have to collect all cattail to find your net
-
ctopolon4
- Posts: 746
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 2:28 pm
- Location: mom's basement
Re: Fishing Net Claims - A Solution
PClaims are OP... nerf em pls
STASON#7865
https://discord.gg/8caX3qH
https://discord.gg/8caX3qH
-
Burinn
- Posts: 3097
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2015 11:48 pm
- Location: Internet Prison Plotting Her Escape
Re: Fishing Net Claims - A Solution
Bad idea imo. Not well thought out
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
-
Audiosmurf
- Posts: 2944
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:00 pm
- Location: Ice Hell
Re: Fishing Net Claims - A Solution
I do feel that with the advent of oceans, fishing nets having no real protection feels iffy. There's not really any way to use them at sea when any shithead with a dugout can take 'em.
This idea is bad, but the thought that prompted it is pretty valid. What about water-based claims? Some kind of relatively expensive (compared to a pclaim) buoy, allowing you to claim a section of the ocean. Not sure if the functionality for building things on water is really there, though.
This idea is bad, but the thought that prompted it is pretty valid. What about water-based claims? Some kind of relatively expensive (compared to a pclaim) buoy, allowing you to claim a section of the ocean. Not sure if the functionality for building things on water is really there, though.
jorb wrote:Audiosmurf isisis a fantastic poster/geniusracist and hisa meat/intellect is hugehomosexual
-
Grog
- Posts: 2747
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:42 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Fishing Net Claims - A Solution
They don't have a hitbox. No blocking.Ysh wrote: I think it will be irritating when the men block rivers with them and you can already build claim and extend it into the waters. This do not seem needed to me.
Favourite thread: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3388
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: Fishing Net Claims - A Solution
in 36 hours you'll catch like 4 fish so that part is dumb but they should indeed have some inherent claim to them