We're at the stage of the world where barely anyone is playing. It's probably a good time to experiment with updates that are likely to be bad so that the few people who are still there can provide feedback and maybe next world players won't leave so fast.
Bad PVP/siege/realm changes in particular can feel devastating when there's still competition, but there's almost none of that left.
-
Ants
- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 9:55 pm
- Location: inside your head
experiment with risky changes now
❤Haven's most kawaii retarded ethot karen❤


-
borka
- Posts: 9965
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:47 pm
- Location: World of Sprucecap
Re: experiment with risky changes now
You may consider that most of those that are still activly playing yet aren't the ones that enjoy
... and what that tells ...PVP/siege/realm changes in particular
Avatar by SacreDoom
Java 8 - manually downloads - good to check for actual versions url here:
viewtopic.php?f=42&t=40331
Remember what the dormouse said: Feed your head Feed your head
Java 8 - manually downloads - good to check for actual versions url here:
viewtopic.php?f=42&t=40331
Remember what the dormouse said: Feed your head Feed your head
-
Ants
- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 9:55 pm
- Location: inside your head
Re: experiment with risky changes now
is that PVP/siege/realm stuff is too broken to be enjoyable?borka wrote:You may consider that most of those that are still activly playing yet aren't the ones that enjoy... and what that tells ...PVP/siege/realm changes in particular
❤Haven's most kawaii retarded ethot karen❤


-
shubla
- Posts: 13041
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:26 am
- Location: Finland
Re: experiment with risky changes now
Yeah I and many others have said this in like every world but devs dont seem to care!

I'm not sure that I have a strong argument against sketch colors - Jorb, November 2019
http://i.imgur.com/CRrirds.png?1
Join the moderated unofficial discord for the game! https://discord.gg/2TAbGj2
Purus Pasta, The Best Client
-
borka
- Posts: 9965
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:47 pm
- Location: World of Sprucecap
Re: experiment with risky changes now
Well i think i have to write clearly;Ants wrote:is that PVP/siege/realm stuff is too broken to be enjoyable?borka wrote:You may consider that most of those that are still activly playing yet aren't the ones that enjoy... and what that tells ...PVP/siege/realm changes in particular
Consider that the very most that still play activly yet are in no way interested in PVP or Siege stuff ...
Avatar by SacreDoom
Java 8 - manually downloads - good to check for actual versions url here:
viewtopic.php?f=42&t=40331
Remember what the dormouse said: Feed your head Feed your head
Java 8 - manually downloads - good to check for actual versions url here:
viewtopic.php?f=42&t=40331
Remember what the dormouse said: Feed your head Feed your head
-
MagicManICT
- Posts: 18435
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am
Re: experiment with risky changes now
Wouldn't that actually be the worst time because all you'd get is that "hard core" feedback and is likely to not be indicative of what a wider audience would think?Ants wrote:It's probably a good time to experiment with updates that are likely to be bad
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.
-
Ants
- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 9:55 pm
- Location: inside your head
Re: experiment with risky changes now
I disagree, a lot of people who still play are in factions and would fight if it was possible. Fights don't happen because things are unbalanced, not because no one is interested.borka wrote:
Well i think i have to write clearly;
Consider that the very most that still play activly yet are in no way interested in PVP or Siege stuff ...
If this crucial part of gameplay isn't fixed before next world, the wider audience will quit rapidly like they did this world. Newbies will build their base, think there's nothing else to do, get bored and quit. Personally I think the game would have more long lasting appeal if base defense was an important part of the game.MagicManICT wrote:Wouldn't that actually be the worst time because all you'd get is that "hard core" feedback and is likely to not be indicative of what a wider audience would think?Ants wrote:It's probably a good time to experiment with updates that are likely to be bad
I think it's better to listen to the hardcore audience for now and when next world starts, if others dislike the changes, they can chime in with their opinion.
❤Haven's most kawaii retarded ethot karen❤


-
borka
- Posts: 9965
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:47 pm
- Location: World of Sprucecap
Re: experiment with risky changes now
Honestly very few ppl in my kinlist or even the area/neighbourhood are member of factions ...Ants wrote: I disagree, a lot of people who still play are in factions and would fight if it was possible.
And so who are the hardcore audience ?!? Explain and name ...Ants wrote:I think it's better to listen to the hardcore audience for now and when next world starts, if others dislike the changes, they can chime in with their opinion.
Don't get me wrong: i do have a lot respect for you just because a lot of your posts are with cause!
Avatar by SacreDoom
Java 8 - manually downloads - good to check for actual versions url here:
viewtopic.php?f=42&t=40331
Remember what the dormouse said: Feed your head Feed your head
Java 8 - manually downloads - good to check for actual versions url here:
viewtopic.php?f=42&t=40331
Remember what the dormouse said: Feed your head Feed your head
-
Ants
- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 9:55 pm
- Location: inside your head
Re: experiment with risky changes now
The hardcore audience is everyone who still plays despite the low number of other players. The ones I know of are mostly AD or HH, probably because I'm part of AD. A lot of fighters quit but some do remain.borka wrote:Honestly very few ppl in my kinlist or even the area/neighbourhood are member of factions ...Ants wrote: I disagree, a lot of people who still play are in factions and would fight if it was possible.
And so who are the hardcore audience ?!? Explain and name ...Ants wrote:I think it's better to listen to the hardcore audience for now and when next world starts, if others dislike the changes, they can chime in with their opinion.
Don't get me wrong: i do have a lot respect for you just because a lot of your posts are with cause!
❤Haven's most kawaii retarded ethot karen❤


-
borka
- Posts: 9965
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:47 pm
- Location: World of Sprucecap
Re: experiment with risky changes now
Ants wrote:The hardcore audience is everyone who still plays despite the low number of other players.
borka wrote:
Well i think i have to write clearly;
Consider that the very most that still play activly yet are in no way interested in PVP or Siege stuff ...
Well 10 of 100? 10 of 200? 10 of 250? areAnts wrote: I disagree, a lot of people who still play are in factions and would fight if it was possible. Fights don't happen because things are unbalanced, not because no one is interested.
you see where it leads even if you try to avoid the reality ...Ants wrote: interested.
and btw opinions of certain "buying combat chars and equipment with RM" ppl doesn't bother in any way ...
Avatar by SacreDoom
Java 8 - manually downloads - good to check for actual versions url here:
viewtopic.php?f=42&t=40331
Remember what the dormouse said: Feed your head Feed your head
Java 8 - manually downloads - good to check for actual versions url here:
viewtopic.php?f=42&t=40331
Remember what the dormouse said: Feed your head Feed your head