To be fair, things shot with an actual camera also has realistic motion blur to compensate for the framerate.Granger wrote:You poor sod, completely unable to enjoy the movies as they're projected at 24 FPS...
The real problem is the existence of 16:9. grumpyoldman.tiffshubla wrote:The real problem is 4:3
So, Summer has come and gone, and the last messages on this thread were from 3 months ago. Any update on this?loftar wrote: Time-wise, since everything seems to be almost complete, I actually don't expect it to take all that much longer. I'm sure there will be bugs aplenty to fix once public testing starts, but unless there are any really hard-to-fix ones (here's to hoping there aren't), I'd expect the new client to be done and in use before summer is over, hopefully sooner rather than later.
This sounds reasonable. Anything to wet our whistle bois.Dogswards wrote:So, Summer has come and gone, and the last messages on this thread were from 3 months ago. Any update on this?loftar wrote: Time-wise, since everything seems to be almost complete, I actually don't expect it to take all that much longer. I'm sure there will be bugs aplenty to fix once public testing starts, but unless there are any really hard-to-fix ones (here's to hoping there aren't), I'd expect the new client to be done and in use before summer is over, hopefully sooner rather than later.
got any timestamps by chance?borka wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5E-2rQIYm0
