Not to say that it isn't perhaps a bit controversial with these kinds of patches, but I don't think we want to put ourselves in a situation where we can't dedicate ourselves to more technical issues for a while without throwing bread and circuses into the game just for the sake of it.shubla wrote:I definitely hope that we get next patch sooner (like in few days) with some additional new hitboxes or anything really.
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Game Development: Bound in Checkers
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
-
Hasta
- Posts: 2250
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 3:27 pm
Re: Game Development: Bound in Checkers
I thought that was the whole point of your existence :<loftar wrote:throwing throwing bread and circuses into the game
Srsly tho, "we made cool new boundary boxes... and implemented them for stuff you will rarely see" is an underwhelming patch =\
-
Artemiswhb
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:57 pm
Re: Game Development: Bound in Checkers
God you people are spoiled 
-
VDZ
- Posts: 2766
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:27 am
Re: Game Development: Bound in Checkers
This is a common issue in software development. You want to make the fancy, impactful stuff, but if you focus only on that the software will become harder to maintain and it will get increasingly difficult to add more stuff (plus, there'll be a higher risk of bugs). A lot of equally time-consuming under-the-hood work needs to be done to facilitate more interesting stuff. If the devs are pressured to always add more fancy stuff, when do they get the chance to work on under-the-hood stuff? In the long term, the less under-the-hood work is done, the less fancy stuff we'll get.Hasta wrote:Srsly tho, "we made cool new boundary boxes... and implemented them for stuff you will rarely see" is an underwhelming patch =\
-
Procne
- Posts: 984
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 3:04 pm
Re: Game Development: Bound in Checkers
I am still amazed devs manage to pump out a little pieces of content on a weekly basis.
-
Glorthan
- Posts: 1099
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:33 pm
Re: Game Development: Bound in Checkers
Spruce trees say "hi".loftar wrote:No, trees are so small that I don't really think the exact shape of their bounding box matters at all.shubla wrote:But how about trees? are they now circular?
There are a few others with obnoxiously large boxes as well.
-
MagicManICT
- Posts: 18435
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am
Re: Game Development: Bound in Checkers
Sometimes it's the most technical, least visible things that will have the greatest impact on the game overall.Hasta wrote:I thought that was the whole point of your existence :<loftar wrote:throwing throwing bread and circuses into the game
Srsly tho, "we made cool new boundary boxes... and implemented them for stuff you will rarely see" is an underwhelming patch =\
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.
-
AtoB
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 12:38 am
Re: Game Development: Bound in Checkers
I know their stance is that automated parts of the game are an indication of lacking mechanics. But along that logic they would need to discard practically the whole game as it as been fully automated by the ones that had to do it because they could. Thus fuck with the bots and private cheat clients, whenever the occasion arises. Make them worthless or counterproductive. So push garbage for hitbox data, then let the first some hundred characters that managed to run in straight lines around obstacles stuble and break their neck.bmjclark wrote:Ironically, it would fuck with the public client users more than it would fuck with the private client users seeing as the private ones are more actively maintained at this point.AtoB wrote: In case the client does not use that data: send it random garbage to fuck with the bots.
Repeat similar from time to time.
-
Amanda44
- Posts: 6485
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:13 pm
Re: Game Development: Bound in Checkers
Just wanted to say, love these big 'cat in the hat' styles.



Koru wrote:
It is like in Lord of the Flies, nobody controlls what is going on in the hearthlands, those weaker and with conscience are just fucked.
Avatar made by Jordan.
Animal lovers - Show us your pets! - viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44444#p577254
It is like in Lord of the Flies, nobody controlls what is going on in the hearthlands, those weaker and with conscience are just fucked.
Avatar made by Jordan.
Animal lovers - Show us your pets! - viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44444#p577254
-
harunic
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:57 pm
Re: Game Development: Bound in Checkers
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
I didnt anything :0