The fact that there is a heated debate about the efficiency in the roman numerical system speaks volumes about the people in this thread.
It's not exactly 'hard' to understand why VIII exists, sure it's not as efficient as possible, but does it really matter?
It probably came about in order, III isn't 'that' long, however IIII was ridiculous, hence why IV came along, VIII was probably to keep with that flow.
(Yes I am aware that III would be the same number of characters when converted to IIV, however the problem is with is in general with the subtraction later down the road, as subtracting 2 only requires 3 characters as opposed to adding 2).
LXXX, XXC for example.
It just happens, it's not like this is a widely used system in everyday life for most people, and it's not like it'll kill you type in one more letter.
What is this shit, xkcd?
-
DatOneGuy
- Posts: 5553
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:50 am
- Location: I'm in Miami, trick.
Re: For those who don't know their Roman numerals
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
Flame
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:03 pm
Re: For those who don't know their Roman numerals
just to give relax, i'm only talking, not debating something important, do not worry :3 It was just to let you understand that, out of number logic, this will be uncomfortable for most people used with the normal roman numbers.
That's all, folks. XD
That's all, folks. XD
-
Wipfmetz
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:23 pm
- Location: Germany. It's near Bavaria.
Re: For those who don't know their Roman numerals
Please convert to the more efficient type of roman numerals and stop wasting precious internet bytes with your wasteful ways, DatOneGuy.
-
niltrias
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 10:19 am
Re: For those who don't know their Roman numerals
I have no argument with most of this. However, it is sort of like saying that "1" is correct but "1" is not.DatOneGuy wrote:The fact that there is a heated debate about the efficiency in the roman numerical system speaks volumes about the people in this thread.
It's not exactly 'hard' to understand why VIII exists, sure it's not as efficient as possible, but does it really matter?
It probably came about in order, III isn't 'that' long, however IIII was ridiculous, hence why IV came along, VIII was probably to keep with that flow.
(Yes I am aware that III would be the same number of characters when converted to IIV, however the problem is with is in general with the subtraction later down the road, as subtracting 2 only requires 3 characters as opposed to adding 2).
LXXX, XXC for example.
It just happens, it's not like this is a widely used system in everyday life for most people, and it's not like it'll kill you type in one more letter.
What is this shit, xkcd?
<Marcher Lord>
Dogs! Oh god, please give us DOGS!
There are those who press on with the ardor of beer, and those who are faint with thirst.
Dogs! Oh god, please give us DOGS!
There are those who press on with the ardor of beer, and those who are faint with thirst.
-
Jacob_Lee
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:26 pm
Re: For those who don't know their Roman numerals
Will all of you stop bitching whether or not it is "VIII" or "IIX"
On the topic of a griefer:


-
niltrias
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 10:19 am
Re: For those who don't know their Roman numerals
No.Jacob_Lee wrote:Will all of you stop bitching whether or not it is "VIII" or "IIX"
Or more likely, yeah, probably.
<Marcher Lord>
Dogs! Oh god, please give us DOGS!
There are those who press on with the ardor of beer, and those who are faint with thirst.
Dogs! Oh god, please give us DOGS!
There are those who press on with the ardor of beer, and those who are faint with thirst.
-
mcdonald5
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:01 pm
Re: For those who don't know their Roman numerals
you know VIII is the correct form because thats how they spell it on the cover of final fantasy VIII.
-
Flame
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:03 pm
Re: For those who don't know their Roman numerals
yes, is the correct way, simply is inefficent. Bur if Romans used VIII, the correct one is VIII.
So..change and wrong the numbers filling OUR modern logic of efficency, OR use 1-2-3-4 and stop with the problem? If we wanna the Romans number, we must use the Romans one. Not the fake romans IIX that aren't romans but just a mix of modern locig and old signs.
If you have some problem with VIII, then we can use Our modern numers, are quite correct and without this problem. 1,2,3,4 and if we have twelve levels, 12. Better than XII or 24, XXIV or....etc
ok?
So..change and wrong the numbers filling OUR modern logic of efficency, OR use 1-2-3-4 and stop with the problem? If we wanna the Romans number, we must use the Romans one. Not the fake romans IIX that aren't romans but just a mix of modern locig and old signs.
If you have some problem with VIII, then we can use Our modern numers, are quite correct and without this problem. 1,2,3,4 and if we have twelve levels, 12. Better than XII or 24, XXIV or....etc
ok?
-
theTrav
- Posts: 3464
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm
Re: For those who don't know their Roman numerals
What really annoys me is how people have ignored ten hundred and jumped straight to thousand, but then gone back on their orders of magnitude thing and stuck with ten thousand and hundreds of thousands before going to million.
one,two,three,four,five,six,seven,eight,nine,
ten (10),
hundred(100),
tenhundred(10 00),
thousand(1 00 00),
tenthousand(10 00 00),
tenhundredthousand(1 00 00 00),
million(10 00 00 00)
BRING BACK TEN HUNDRED DAMNIT!
one,two,three,four,five,six,seven,eight,nine,
ten (10),
hundred(100),
tenhundred(10 00),
thousand(1 00 00),
tenthousand(10 00 00),
tenhundredthousand(1 00 00 00),
million(10 00 00 00)
BRING BACK TEN HUNDRED DAMNIT!
-
DatOneGuy
- Posts: 5553
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:50 am
- Location: I'm in Miami, trick.
Re: For those who don't know their Roman numerals
G...goddamnit, that never bothered me, now this shit is gonna kill my head.theTrav wrote:What really annoys me is how people have ignored ten hundred and jumped straight to thousand, but then gone back on their orders of magnitude thing and stuck with ten thousand and hundreds of thousands before going to million.
one,two,three,four,five,six,seven,eight,nine,
ten (10),
hundred(100),
tenhundred(10 00),
thousand(1 00 00),
tenthousand(10 00 00),
tenhundredthousand(1 00 00 00),
million(10 00 00 00)
BRING BACK TEN HUNDRED DAMNIT!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .