Official Chatgpt discussion thread

[Trappin]

The problem regarding ChatBot isn't how "we the people" interact with it - the question really is how various government agencies will abuse it and the data mining associated with AI "teaching" algorithms to shape "trusted" control of free speech across the internet. And how best to formulate and regulate religious and idealogical propaganda.

Scientism is the approved and checkmarked 21st century religion. So you're an outsider if you happen to be into Confucianism or a Lutheran. The Red Guard of the CCP murdered Confucianists; part of Chairman Mao's Four Olds campaign.

Big Tech Corp© threatens our freedom of speech in ways twentieth century totalitarians only dreamt about.

What's your Socia Credit Score? Do Tic Tok, Google and Facebook approve you?

[overtyped]

The problem regarding ChatBot isn't how "we the people" interact with it - the question really is how various government agencies will abuse it and the data mining associated with AI "teaching" algorithms to shape "trusted" control of free speech across the internet. And how best to formulate and regulate religious and idealogical propaganda.

Scientism is the approved and checkmarked 21st century religion. So you're an outsider if you happen to be into Confucianism or a Lutheran. The Red Guard of the CCP murdered Confucianists; part of Chairman Mao's Four Olds campaign.

Big Tech Corp© threatens our freedom of speech in ways twentieth century totalitarians only dreamt about.

What's your Socia Credit Score? Do Tic Tok, Google and Facebook approve you?

No, AI is just a funny program that you can talk to. there's no danger. I never get my comments hidden from view because YouTube or anywhere else's AI doesn't like them. And if it does happen, it's not an AI hivemind doing it, because I trust them to do it the right way, by using an 8-year-old sweatshop slave in China to filter me.

[sMartins]

Well ... it happened to The Donald.

Edit

oh ... , language issue, I didn't realise.

[Trappin]

The problem regarding ChatBot isn't how "we the people" interact with it - the question really is how various government agencies will abuse it and the data mining associated with AI "teaching" algorithms to shape "trusted" control of free speech across the internet. And how best to formulate and regulate religious and idealogical propaganda.

Scientism is the approved and checkmarked 21st century religion. So you're an outsider if you happen to be into Confucianism or a Lutheran. The Red Guard of the CCP murdered Confucianists; part of Chairman Mao's Four Olds campaign.

Big Tech Corp© threatens our freedom of speech in ways twentieth century totalitarians only dreamt about.

What's your Socia Credit Score? Do Tic Tok, Google and Facebook approve you?

No, AI is just a funny program that you can talk to. there's no danger. I never get my comments hidden from view because YouTube or anywhere else's AI doesn't like them. And if it does happen, it's not an AI hivemind doing it, because I trust them to do it the right way, by using an 8-year-old sweatshop slave in China to filter me.

No. You need to slow down and read what I typed. You even quoted it "the problem with Chatbot isn't about how "we the people" interact with it," which neatly sums up the front end of the "funny little program."
as you term it.

No. The AI tech behind the chatbot "progran" isn't cute and cuddly like some big eyed anime doll with huge boobs. The algorithm is not a "hivemind," since computers lack a mind or brain or cognitive functions. You put those words into my mouth. Nor am O talking about sweatshops. Again, those are your words. You've a habit of doing that - attributing things to me which I've not said.

[Trappin]

Well ... it happened to The Donald.

Edit

oh ... ;) , language issue, I didn't realise.

Do you have masturbatory fantasies about Nietzsche? And after climax, you sigh, light up a clove scented cigarette and imagine yourself in a black and white new wave Trauffant film?

[bumfrog]

ai is like nfts: the more the better

[sMartins]

Do you have masturbatory fantasies about Nietzsche? And after climax, you sigh, light up a clove scented cigarette and imagine yourself in a black and white new wave Trauffant film?

I seem to see some anger in these words, I can understand you, the suggestion to let it go, and as you yourself said, slow down.

I also pretty much agree with what you wrote, well actually, not completely on the fact that technology does not affect the user as well, in fact it changes us and becomes part of ourselves, but that's another matter.

If you want to talk about it, I'm available.

Have a nice day.

[overtyped]

The problem regarding ChatBot isn't how "we the people" interact with it - the question really is how various government agencies will abuse it and the data mining associated with AI "teaching" algorithms to shape "trusted" control of free speech across the internet. And how best to formulate and regulate religious and idealogical propaganda.

Scientism is the approved and checkmarked 21st century religion. So you're an outsider if you happen to be into Confucianism or a Lutheran. The Red Guard of the CCP murdered Confucianists; part of Chairman Mao's Four Olds campaign.

Big Tech Corp© threatens our freedom of speech in ways twentieth century totalitarians only dreamt about.

What's your Socia Credit Score? Do Tic Tok, Google and Facebook approve you?

No, AI is just a funny program that you can talk to. there's no danger. I never get my comments hidden from view because YouTube or anywhere else's AI doesn't like them. And if it does happen, it's not an AI hivemind doing it, because I trust them to do it the right way, by using an 8-year-old sweatshop slave in China to filter me.

No. You need to slow down and read what I typed. You even quoted it "the problem with Chatbot isn't about how "we the people" interact with it," which neatly sums up the front end of the "funny little program."
as you term it.

No. The AI tech behind the chatbot "progran" isn't cute and cuddly like some big eyed anime doll with huge boobs. The algorithm is not a "hivemind," since computers lack a mind or brain or cognitive functions. You put those words into my mouth. Nor am O talking about sweatshops. Again, those are your words. You've a habit of doing that - attributing things to me which I've not said.

Um, no, im pretty sure the ai doesn't have a social credit score, so why would they care about it? And forgive me if I'm mistaken, but it seems like you're placing quite a bit of emphasis on sweatshops, because you've mentioned it several times now. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that forced labor was universally frowned upon. Sorry if you disagree with that.

[sMartins]

[Archiplex]

you know you've stoked the flames when you get 4 smartins and whatever the other schizo's name is posts in a row