Att. Jorbtar : Let W16 live!

[Granny]

With the news of a live stream comes the question - will there be a W17 now, and subsequently what about this lovely world of 16? Will it continue to live on?

As I have previously written I have enjoyed immensely the slow pace that has come with W16. I have had some time to do all the things I normally do not have time for. And - again: I would love for it to just be there, as Legacy have been for so many years.


Cheers!

Granny

[Fostik]

No, get yourself together and let things go
W16 should die, parallel worlds showed it's bad

[MightySheep]

Time to put granny in a care home she going senile

[jippe]

With the news of a live stream comes the question - will there be a W17 now, and subsequently what about this lovely world of 16? Will it continue to live on?

As I have previously written I have enjoyed immensely the slow pace that has come with W16. I have had some time to do all the things I normally do not have time for. And - again: I would love for it to just be there, as Legacy have been for so many years.


Cheers!

Granny

I second this motion.. Keep W16 alive..

[Frogg]

I wonder what it costs to keep W16 running for those few players. One player on a bronze sub would be enough to make it profitable, right?

[524u]

Go play vintage story

[mvgulik]

What seem to be the potential options:

1) They start a 16.2 world (with some additional minor new stuff). Which would leave 16.0 world as is.

2) They start a 17.0 world (or perhaps even test start a 17.1 world first). Which would include major new stuff.
Here they still could:
2a) keep world 16.0 alive ... in case they might need to test how 2 different (code wise) game-servers workout. (16.0 & 16.1 are probably both using the same main server/game code, with some time tweaks ofc.)
2b) Kill world 16.0. (new world would than be a 17.0 case)

3) This is an option that makes no sense at all. They start both a 17.0 and 17.1 world.

Time will tell. ... I bet they take option 3.

[sMartins]

No, just 16.x worlds untill oco is done

[boshaw]

No, just 16.x worlds untill oco is done

So we're never getting w17?

[Granny]

I wonder what it costs to keep W16 running for those few players. One player on a bronze sub would be enough to make it profitable, right?

Indeed. It is probably an easy calculation. Keep players happy so they keep paying in a forever home as W16, or risk losing those players all together.