I have a long list of people on my kin list and i tried to describe them all to another player. these are all kinned people, not memorized. There are about 10 people on my kin list who i cannot describe. they cannot be memorized again, because we are already kinned. so iam assuming this is a bug. they are also not dead as i was able to describe a dead guy, and 1 of the people is a guy who is online right now.
so iam assuming there is a bug with the way describing works, the button exists for all kinned people but you cannot describe them all. for memorized people, you have a button if you can, and no button if you cannot. all people who are kinned should be describable.
-
DeadlyPencil
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:17 am
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: cannot describe mutually kinned people
what do you mean "mutually kinned"? the person you're trying to describe them to also has them kinned? or what?
-
DeadlyPencil
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:17 am
Re: cannot describe mutually kinned people
i put that in the title so retards wouldn't say, oh u cant describe certain memorized people etc because they didn't read my post. These are kinned people i cannot decribe. people i can PM.
you should have a pretty big list, just go down the list on all your kinned people, click the describe to button and assuming you added people in different ways, some wont be able to. who knows what way is causing it though. iam assuming i could test each one... but they havent exactly fixed any of the previous bugs i have posted so i dont wanna spend time.
you should have a pretty big list, just go down the list on all your kinned people, click the describe to button and assuming you added people in different ways, some wont be able to. who knows what way is causing it though. iam assuming i could test each one... but they havent exactly fixed any of the previous bugs i have posted so i dont wanna spend time.
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: cannot describe mutually kinned people
so, just normal kinned people then? why are you using the word "mutual" 
-
DeadlyPencil
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:17 am
Re: cannot describe mutually kinned people
to be a kin, it has to be mutual. however to be memorized it doesn't. the list is refered to the kin list. so by saying kinned people, stupid people might think i was refering to memorized people instead of people who are actually kin.
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: cannot describe mutually kinned people
while i understand your logic, i'd think that one would have to be really stupid to think that. mutuality is required by kin, so the addition of the word mutual causes some confusion (to me anyway), seemingly implying that two or more people have the person or persons kinned.
-
DeadlyPencil
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:17 am
Re: cannot describe mutually kinned people
can you either check your own kin list for this problem or go post in another topic. I made 2 bug reports, maybe you can go analyze my wording in that one for a change.
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: cannot describe mutually kinned people
well after testing everyone in my kin list, it seems like there are 3 that i can't describe, all were added via hearth secret iirc, and iirc, i've never seen any of them face-to-face.
-
sabinati
- Posts: 15527
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
- Location: View active topics
Re: cannot describe mutually kinned people
analyze this wording: chill out or go fuck yourselfDeadlyPencil wrote:can you either check your own kin list for this problem or go post in another topic. I made 2 bug reports, maybe you can go analyze my wording in that one for a change.
-
jinnwarior
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 10:32 pm
Re: cannot describe mutually kinned people
dont you have to have actually seen people to describe them? if so, have you?