Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Decision reached.

Announcements about major changes in Haven & Hearth.
VoodooDog
Posts: 856
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:27 pm

Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.

Post by VoodooDog »

you mean the guys who u aggroed for fun on the rob. cuz its sooo funny (and totally not dumb) to agro newbie's at the rob with the new bugmegaskills.
and the guys who are not so happy with ur trading style..

i can say that most ppl (not you and ur guys and not g1real and his mate) have made good ingame experiences with me. so where is the point ?

the problem still is that you guys get MUCH to strong and still grow up faster than others (cuz you have still some HQ stuff left from this coal). for example the hq trees. you get it from a epic herb table who was madet out of epic boards (where you get from the epic saw).

maybe they should rebuild the whole village and get a lp shrink to 1million.

or we become a complete map reset ^^


ps: the remove all smithing tools wont help here.
BenHa
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:09 pm

Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.

Post by BenHa »

VoodooDog wrote: or we become a complete map reset ^^
I truly laughed my ass off. That was good voodoo :-D
User avatar
kLauE
Posts: 1085
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:58 am

Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.

Post by kLauE »

VoodooDog wrote: maybe they should rebuild the whole village and get a lp shrink to 1million.
lol then i lose over 6 mio without using any bugs... such a great idea faggot
VoodooDog
Posts: 856
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:27 pm

Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.

Post by VoodooDog »

it dosnt implement you when i write "they".
User avatar
burgingham
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.

Post by burgingham »

VoodooDog wrote:it dosnt implement you when i write "they".

Ah now I get it, the devs should rebuiold our city and shrink their own lp to 1 million, that makes much more sense. Because then we would truly be the new gods of the game :roll:
VoodooDog
Posts: 856
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:27 pm

Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.

Post by VoodooDog »

ahh guys. whats wrong with you. even when i say "lower ther lp to 3million" you would cry like babies.
the most stuff in ur village have to get destroyed cuz its to hq.
User avatar
burgingham
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.

Post by burgingham »

I do not disagree with that, we told the devs in our bugreport that there is still some stuff with qualities between 200-900 left, but they did not take it from us. If this is fixed I am totally fine with that. But lowering stats in an alpha, this is the first time I ever hear about using a method like this. Because although our high q materials might be destroying parts of the game, our stats are not. There are still chars out there who should be stronger than us.
High lvl chars can be useful on discovering bugs that wouldn't have been noticed otherwise etc. etc.
But even if the devs decide to decrease our lp or attributes I am fine with that as long as they don't take lp I would have gotten anyways.
User avatar
Jackard
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.

Post by Jackard »

I, for one, welcome our new hammy overlords.
swebonny
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:17 am

Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.

Post by swebonny »

Haha Xybb, so this is where the 6-7k damage is coming from. I thought you were joking all the time.
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Olympus v.s. Wayneville: Sentence pending.

Post by Potjeh »

You don't happen to have character progress stored, do you? I think fairest thing would be to reset them to the LP they had before the bug abuse, plus LP an average active character earned since then. Same for stats. Primary bug items were fixed IIRC. I think we can live if they keep the secondary ones, as long as they have reasonable quality (ie not greater than best items acquired through legitimate means).

However, I think this should only be done this once, because there was no warning against it. Next time somebody finds a bug and abuses it without reporting it to the devs, just delete all of his characters completely. We can't have alpha testers behave like that.
Image Bottleneck

Return to “Announcements”