yooo jorbbbb

jorb · Post by **jorb** » Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:32 am

Not entirely sure I see the point. Also: Great titling of a threadstart.

tigerlrg245 · Post by **tigerlrg245** » Mon Jul 23, 2018 10:59 am

This is the forum post embodiment of a drunk dial

DatSheep · Post by **DatSheep** » Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:47 pm

Facts xD

Granger · Post by **Granger** » Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:55 pm

jorb wrote:Not entirely sure I see the point. Also: Great titling of a threadstart.

I suspect the idea is to run a parallel experimental world in which the feasibility of mechanics with regard to a permanent world (=free of the need for wipes stemming from quality runaway or exhaustion of natural resources/pristine wilderness) can be tested, with an accelerated timeframe thanks to massively increased decay rates.

Cece · Post by **Cece** » Wed Jul 25, 2018 7:10 am

Onep wrote:Splitting the small player-base even more is not necessary. 0/10

i dont know why haven doesn't mail people updates and remind them that this game still exists, i mean i get that most people wont likely return after being deeply disappointed in that sudden p2p model shift but atleast some would come back, i have yet to return and i dont think i would for the same reason but i may change my mind if the playercount is atleast 300

Jalpha · Post by **Jalpha** » Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:31 am

Player count improves every reset and holds for longer. I think the devs are still gaining momentum, like the worlds now are the warmup race before the main event.

Or they are just dirty casuals lol. THIS GAME IS MY LIFE AND THEY ONLY DEDICATE 20HRS OF THEIR TIME EACH WEEK, REEEEE!

Post by **Onep** » Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:33 am

Cece wrote:
Onep wrote:Splitting the small player-base even more is not necessary. 0/10
i dont know why haven doesn't mail people updates and remind them that this game still exists, i mean i get that most people wont likely return after being deeply disappointed in that sudden p2p model shift but atleast some would come back, i have yet to return and i dont think i would for the same reason but i may change my mind if the playercount is atleast 300

You're a subhuman with an anime avatar. Go spend your NEETbux on animu figurines to post in your 'hotglue' threads.

DatSheep · Post by **DatSheep** » Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:26 pm

Onep wrote:
Cece wrote:
Onep wrote:Splitting the small player-base even more is not necessary. 0/10
i dont know why haven doesn't mail people updates and remind them that this game still exists, i mean i get that most people wont likely return after being deeply disappointed in that sudden p2p model shift but atleast some would come back, i have yet to return and i dont think i would for the same reason but i may change my mind if the playercount is atleast 300
You're a subhuman with an anime avatar. Go spend your NEETbux on animu figurines to post in your 'hotglue' threads.

Damn u right

Sebthegrand · Post by **Sebthegrand** » Sat Aug 04, 2018 2:11 am

i bet that perma server would have a much higher pop for the simple fact people wouldn't be waiting for a world reset lmao. game takes way to much effort for world resets, salems garbage but they pull it off somehow

DDDsDD999 · Post by **DDDsDD999** » Sat Aug 04, 2018 7:34 am

Sebthegrand wrote:i bet that perma server would have a much higher pop for the simple fact people wouldn't be waiting for a world reset lmao. game takes way to much effort for world resets, salems garbage but they pull it off somehow

Haven is in no way ready for a permanent world. Salem also pulls nothing of note off.

yooo jorbbbb

Re: yooo jorbbbb

Re: yooo jorbbbb

Re: yooo jorbbbb

Re: yooo jorbbbb

Re: yooo jorbbbb

Re: yooo jorbbbb

Re: yooo jorbbbb

Re: yooo jorbbbb

Re: yooo jorbbbb

Re: yooo jorbbbb