Charming, for sure...DatOneGuy wrote:what you need to do is stop crying like a little bitch about the system and start turning that bitchy little whiny crying shit into some fucking properly placed aggression, get buff as fuck and fuck up the niggers who fucked you up.
-
Sitting_Bill
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:35 am
Re: Update on village life
in game character: Gunnar of Hlidarendi
-
Abandinus
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:13 am
Re: Update on village life
that was pretty random for someone to say, but yah suck it up get better at combat (: I know, iv been reading the combat guide over & over
-
Tonkyhonk
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
Re: Update on village life
DoG was saying that to arriel cause he/she was bitching about the system with some wrong & stupid assumptions.
they are all for pvp NOT just because they can beat you all up.
im all for pvp even when i cant beat anyone but animals.
got it?
they are all for pvp NOT just because they can beat you all up.
im all for pvp even when i cant beat anyone but animals.
got it?
-
Potjeh
- Posts: 11825
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: Update on village life
Theory is actually fairly simple, it's the practice that's tricky. So stop reading and find a sparring partnerAbandinus wrote:that was pretty random for someone to say, but yah suck it up get better at combat (: I know, iv been reading the combat guide over & over
-
arriel
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:40 pm
Re: Update on village life
You are a paragon of truth, I got it. Whatever you don`t agree with personally is bitching, wrong and stupid.Tonkyhonk wrote:DoG was saying that to arriel cause he/she was bitching about the system with some wrong & stupid assumptions.
they are all for pvp NOT just because they can beat you all up.
im all for pvp even when i cant beat anyone but animals.
got it?
I`ll try to remember it next time I post.
-
Tonkyhonk
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
Re: Update on village life
but what you wrote previously are both obviously wrong and stupidarriel wrote:You are a paragon of truth, I got it. Whatever you don`t agree with personally is bitching, wrong and stupid.
I`ll try to remember it next time I post.
*edit*
↓ im not mad at you at all
Last edited by Tonkyhonk on Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Sitting_Bill
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:35 am
Re: Update on village life
;( Tonky dont be mad at me please, I think you're really cool! I'm in the same boatTonkyhonk wrote:DoG was saying that to arriel cause he/she was bitching about the system with some wrong & stupid assumptions.
they are all for pvp NOT just because they can beat you all up.
im all for pvp even when i cant beat anyone but animals.
got it?
I'm also totally for pvp. arriel, if you don't like it, I guess its not the game for you. If you read Jorb's post, there really is no refuting it, as it is basically just logic...
I'm sorry I overreacted DoG - I don't think that comment is very classy, but seems like arriel is actually quite whiny. Abandinus is not, he has taken his death like a man, and once things have been explained to him he doesn't need to be told again, he's a good guy.
in game character: Gunnar of Hlidarendi
-
arriel
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:40 pm
Re: Update on village life
I do not think it is for you to decide. I`ve been playing since w3 and so far managed to avoid any combat. I`m all the more happy for it, because pvp system in this game sucks like nobodys business. I`ve been playing too many games over years to still have stokholm syndrome over things like that.Sitting_Bill wrote:I'm also totally for pvp. arriel, if you don't like it, I guess its not the game for you.
Define "obvious" then. There are people who agree with my point of view, there are people who agree with yours. We are both entitled to our opinions - which are based on a different ingame experiences. I believe you are going with the flow, trying to take the stronger side - mods/devs, you know.. I can understand that, but I don`t do it, personally.Tonkyhonk wrote:but what you wrote previously are both obviously wrong and stupidnot just my personal agreement nor disagreement.
-
Neptjunoue
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 3:20 am
Re: Update on village life
Unlike many of the people, I prefer to a be a pacifist and not deal with combat and war. True that I learn how to fight and the idea for me is to not use it. Of course with so many dangers from hostile hearthlings as well as organized raider groups, that is would be very difficult to maintain so I study how to fight others, not just animals and I push my toon to the point where less things are extremely hazardous to my health. I prefer not to fight but have to learn how to as well as learn how to avoid these danger unless I become another number in the death statistic. Whether I like PvP or not is irrelevant, it is there and it will not be removed
I refuse to be another whine thread.
I refuse to die for someone's sadistic pleasure.
I refuse to be another whine thread.
I refuse to die for someone's sadistic pleasure.
Reaper, Reaper, that's what people call me! Why?
Cause they all die! When I sing, I end their lives
You act as though payback makes you a noble man
Is that a fact? Well, you're a goddamn Philistine!
Cause they all die! When I sing, I end their lives
You act as though payback makes you a noble man
Is that a fact? Well, you're a goddamn Philistine!
-
Tonkyhonk
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
Re: Update on village life
i dont have to define "obvious", cause you can just look up your dictionary.
but i guess i need to define how your lines were wrong and stupid, right?
Daemmon, alpha, the stupidest ever portgas, all are playing not longer than i am, but they can easily kill me.
AD started playing much later, but look, lots of players avoided fighting them too. did they always lose? hell, no.
DoG has mentioned how he stood up after his first village was destroyed, another example. there are many players who have been playing longer than DoG, but can they always kill DoG? or Nao? or kLauE? or whoever. think about it.
(im just trying to pick players who started playing after some time and well-known, not listing the strongest or anything.)
also, dont forget how "permadeath" makes this possible as well. you dont always die from pvp.
politics is another thing you can avoid yourself from being in the fighting mess, and making friends in game does too.
grouping up makes other fighters run, look at how MS-13 gangs ran from the out-numbered opponents?
(they couldnt know they were Pandas when they started running of course, they didnt even see how many there were.)
2) your first line is a false sentence, then the second line doesnt make sense. if you dont see that, stupid.
3) say, even if your first line is true sometimes. how do you know "that is exactly why people are all for the open pvp" when you arent them? that is your mere "assumption" not the "fact". do you understand what "assumption" means?
4) im all for open PVP system because of dramas and politics, and most importantly, player side can deal with griefers by pvp and/or politics using forums, not relying upon devs all the time for fixes or banning or whatever the methods they may have to take, like other MMOs. and im pretty sure im not the only one feeling this way.
there are more reasons for other players to go all for open pvp, but i see no need to list cause youd know better. if you dont, sorry, but must call that stupid, again.
but i guess i need to define how your lines were wrong and stupid, right?
wrong, because players CAN stand up to people who are playing longer. isnt it obvious?arriel wrote:You`ll never be able to stand up to people that play longer than you, if they are still actively playing o___O
Daemmon, alpha, the stupidest ever portgas, all are playing not longer than i am, but they can easily kill me.
AD started playing much later, but look, lots of players avoided fighting them too. did they always lose? hell, no.
DoG has mentioned how he stood up after his first village was destroyed, another example. there are many players who have been playing longer than DoG, but can they always kill DoG? or Nao? or kLauE? or whoever. think about it.
(im just trying to pick players who started playing after some time and well-known, not listing the strongest or anything.)
also, dont forget how "permadeath" makes this possible as well. you dont always die from pvp.
politics is another thing you can avoid yourself from being in the fighting mess, and making friends in game does too.
grouping up makes other fighters run, look at how MS-13 gangs ran from the out-numbered opponents?
(they couldnt know they were Pandas when they started running of course, they didnt even see how many there were.)
1) who is Burningham? obviously stupid. you dont even correct it. stupid2.arriel wrote:And that is exactly why people like Burningham are all for the open pvp system.
2) your first line is a false sentence, then the second line doesnt make sense. if you dont see that, stupid.
3) say, even if your first line is true sometimes. how do you know "that is exactly why people are all for the open pvp" when you arent them? that is your mere "assumption" not the "fact". do you understand what "assumption" means?
4) im all for open PVP system because of dramas and politics, and most importantly, player side can deal with griefers by pvp and/or politics using forums, not relying upon devs all the time for fixes or banning or whatever the methods they may have to take, like other MMOs. and im pretty sure im not the only one feeling this way.
there are more reasons for other players to go all for open pvp, but i see no need to list cause youd know better. if you dont, sorry, but must call that stupid, again.
Last edited by Tonkyhonk on Wed Jun 15, 2011 8:59 am, edited 1 time in total.