OATHING ! ! ! !

Karede · Post by **Karede** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:37 pm

Xcom wrote:Sounds like the, don't play don't understand syndrome.

Perfect description for just about all of the Hafen suggestions I've seen

Amanda44 · Post by **Amanda44** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 11:41 pm

Karede wrote:
Amanda44 wrote:
Karede wrote:You know that that's not the case. And this is kind of moot now that it's been fixed
Not really if they are doing away with it ......
Anyway, no point in two conversations about it.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=38072&start=50#p504524
To clarify, I was referring to the "So maybe they want a game more focused on factions and less on survival or individual stuff." part specifically, nothing else

Karede wrote:And this is kind of moot now that it's been fixed

Amanda44 wrote:Not really if they are doing away with it ......

Makes sense to me.

Karede · Post by **Karede** » Sun Jan 18, 2015 11:54 pm

Meant that the debate was moot in relation to oathing in this version of the game I'm well aware that my argument is more than a little garbled
They've also mentioned approaching future development with a single player focus, meaning not focused on factions and less on individual stuff

Amanda44 · Post by **Amanda44** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:55 am

Karede wrote:Meant that the debate was moot in relation to oathing in this version of the game I'm well aware that my argument is more than a little garbled
They've also mentioned approaching future development with a single player focus, meaning not focused on factions and less on individual stuff

Why exactly are you talking to me as if I'm illiterate?
What is it you think I don't understand?

I'll try one last time ....................

I know what you meant, my reply is meaning the discussion isn't moot per se, which I would have thought was blatantly obvious as oathing has been fixed now.
As for what they have said, again, I can read, I think you'll find it was Ven who made the comment with regard to focusing on factions, so you have no need to repeat the devs 'intentions' to me, or explain that single player focus is not focusing on factions.

But thanks.

venatorvenator · Post by **venatorvenator** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:26 am

Lol what's going on in this thread?

Yes, that's what they said. But what matters is what they will end up doing, and the talk was about them reworking trade and oathing in such a manner that would make the life of casual hermits and non-faction players very hard as several of us pointed out - so hard, in fact, that for me the most reasonable way out would be to join major villages, thus bloating factions, reducing loner population, and increasing sociability. You denied that was the case, and I argued that this might be case.

Woot · Post by **Woot** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:53 am

I'm just saying, there is something to be said for making long distance travel a necessity, the world feels so empty with everyone squirreled away behind brick walls.

Karede · Post by **Karede** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 5:50 am

Amanda44 wrote:logic and reason

It's very possible that I'm the one that's illiterate here. My mistake

Amanda44 · Post by **Amanda44** » Mon Jan 19, 2015 6:39 pm

Karede wrote:
Amanda44 wrote:logic and reason
It's very possible that I'm the one that's illiterate here. My mistake

No worries.

SilverBull · Post by **SilverBull** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 1:56 am

cant delete my posts =( that or im too stupid to figure it out

SilverBull · Post by **SilverBull** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:02 am

i will say this tho, the only problem i see in the future is people setting up "miles" of brick walls protecting thier trade routes which would hamper travel and exploration for those who arnt withen the bwall road

OATHING ! ! ! !

Re: OATHING ! ! ! !

Re: OATHING ! ! ! !

Re: OATHING ! ! ! !

Re: OATHING ! ! ! !

THIS TITLE HAS TOO MANY SPACES AND EXCLAMATION MARKS

Re: OATHING ! ! ! !

Re: OATHING ! ! ! !

Re: OATHING ! ! ! !

Re: OATHING ! ! ! !

Re: OATHING ! ! ! !