-
Paislee
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 4:28 am
A question about prospecting
When I attempt to prospect for minerals, sometimes I get a message that says something like, "Direction: -7, delta: 5," along with visual radius without the cone to show you direction. Nothing about a percent. Am I doing it wrong? 
~Maisy
-
slipper
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: A question about prospecting
Code: Select all
[00:16] <loftar> What is the problem, to begin with?
[00:16] <Tonky> just a circle and nothing else
[00:16] <Tonky> and prospect again to find nothing
[00:17] <loftar> Ah, that. That's just a bug in the blip effect, actually.Whenever it shows just a circle with no dart, you should interpret it as east.-
Paislee
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 4:28 am
-
brayan
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:30 pm
Re: A question about prospecting
I also have a question about prospecting.
Okay, so, if it says in a dialog box, that there's minerals, it means that there's minerals below you, and you have to make a minehole to get down there. But, what does the dowsing rod arrow mean? Let's get a clear cut, once and for all answer: Does it mean that there's minerals BELOW you, in that direction, or that there are minerals ON THE SAME LEVEL AS YOU, in that direction?
Okay, so, if it says in a dialog box, that there's minerals, it means that there's minerals below you, and you have to make a minehole to get down there. But, what does the dowsing rod arrow mean? Let's get a clear cut, once and for all answer: Does it mean that there's minerals BELOW you, in that direction, or that there are minerals ON THE SAME LEVEL AS YOU, in that direction?
-
Paislee
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 4:28 am
-
MagicManICT
- Posts: 18435
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am
Re: A question about prospecting
No thinking about it. It always points at the minerals on the layer below the one you are on.Paislee wrote:I think it always points to minerals below you.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.
-
TeckXKnight
- Posts: 8274
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
- Location: How Do I?
Re: A question about prospecting
Yes, it does that. Just keep going and prospecting every 5 or 6 steps and after a few tries you'll find the vein.Paislee wrote:If I go a few steps to the east I get, "No minerals found."
-
burgingham
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm
Re: A question about prospecting
Prospecting is just bugged. It does that even when you stay on the same tile sometimes. First you get an arrow, try again without moving and using the same rr extract and it says no mineals found.
-
Canoobians
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:28 am
Re: A question about prospecting
so how do you search for minerals then other than wandering around until you luck out and are standing on top of one?burgingham wrote:Prospecting is just bugged. It does that even when you stay on the same tile sometimes. First you get an arrow, try again without moving and using the same rr extract and it says no mineals found.
-
Tonkyhonk
- Posts: 4501
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
Re: A question about prospecting
actually more about that topic later onslipper wrote:Code: Select all
[00:16] <loftar> What is the problem, to begin with? [00:16] <Tonky> just a circle and nothing else [00:16] <Tonky> and prospect again to find nothing [00:17] <loftar> Ah, that. That's just a bug in the blip effect, actually.Whenever it shows just a circle with no dart, you should interpret it as east.
i havent got time to try prospecting again after this conversation yet, though.12:20 loftar > If anything, it might be susceptible to aliasing effects at certain points. I was planning a minor fix to stabilize it, but I forgot about it.
12:20 Tonky > yeah, that minor fix, i was asking aboutglad you remember it now
12:21 loftar > Or no, actually, it seems I hadn't forgot about it. It seems to be in the code.
12:21 Tonky > oh?
12:21 Tonky > so is it fixed?
12:21 loftar > To the best of my knowledge, at least.