QL 82 clay is serious business

[ARCHIVE FOR WORLDS 1&2]Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.
User avatar
Delamore
Posts: 1234
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:11 am

QL 82 clay is serious business

Post by Delamore »

User avatar
kLauE
Posts: 1085
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:58 am

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Post by kLauE »

solid fail xanadu :lol:
User avatar
Zelacks
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Post by Zelacks »

BY the looks of it... now no one can get the Q82 clay? Wow....
Around Zelacks -- NEVER RELAX
User avatar
Delamore
Posts: 1234
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:11 am

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Post by Delamore »

Zelacks wrote:BY the looks of it... now no one can get the Q82 clay? Wow....
I sure can.
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Post by Potjeh »

Wait, villages can overlap? That doesn't seem right to me.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
sabinati
Posts: 15527
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
Location: View active topics

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Post by sabinati »

as long as the inner circles don't touch
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Post by Potjeh »

It wasn't like that before. We had a second idol in Bottleneck that couldn't be activated because it was too close to the existing village, and distance between it and the closest statue was bigger than the distance between these two idols.

Anyway, I'd just like to say that there should be a minimal distance between two village claims, because as it is not even a village claim can protect your personal claim from a determined griefer.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
Delamore
Posts: 1234
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:11 am

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Post by Delamore »

Potjeh wrote:It wasn't like that before. We had a second idol in Bottleneck that couldn't be activated because it was too close to the existing village, and distance between it and the closest statue was bigger than the distance between these two idols.

Anyway, I'd just like to say that there should be a minimal distance between two village claims, because as it is not even a village claim can protect your personal claim from a determined griefer.
Unless your personal claim is in the deep red zone of a village right?
You mean as in it can be protected and your statement goes out the window?
User avatar
Potjeh
Posts: 11825
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Post by Potjeh »

OK, you win.

Still, overlapping villages just seems wrong to me.
Image Bottleneck
User avatar
maltmaker
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:33 pm

Re: QL 82 clay is serious business

Post by maltmaker »

goodness am i jealous of you. how much do you charge for a few cubbords full of it?

Return to “[ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled”