Bounding boxes of houses

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!
User avatar
Schattengaenger
Posts: 290
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:49 am

Bounding boxes of houses

Post by Schattengaenger »

hello fellow hearthlings,

I think this is the very first critique I ever posted:
Take the timber house ... it needs an area of 7x7 to be built but only because the bounding box-corners sit in the center of the tile .. with ":placegrid 2" I should be able to build it and have it perfectly alined with the terrain grid thus making it it's true 6x6 area and it seems to work, until you try to dig up a earthern hitt directly around it ... "there is not enough clearance to dig here" on 2 sides and it is fine on the other 2 ...

Then I reminded myself of the W11 changelog: "Bounding boxes are now generally symmetrical. Strange offsets and artifacts removed."
So did you miss this or is it intentional? If the latter, why?
User avatar
Granger
Posts: 9255
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:00 pm

Re: Bounding boxes of houses

Post by Granger »

Dig first, pave, place house.
⁎ Mon Mar 22, 2010 ✝ Thu Jan 23, 2020
User avatar
loftar
Posts: 9096
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
Location: Your character database

Re: Bounding boxes of houses

Post by loftar »

I suspect it's more about how the clearance mechanic works than how the bounding boxes look. Might have a look at it.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
User avatar
Schattengaenger
Posts: 290
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:49 am

Re: Bounding boxes of houses

Post by Schattengaenger »

Granger wrote:Dig first, pave, place house.
"ground isn't flat enough"

yeah I thought of that, too.

Return to “Critique & Ideas”