ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.
User avatar
parisparisparis
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 9:56 am

Re: ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Post by parisparisparis »

ramones wrote:
parisparisparis wrote: i didn't say there was problem with farmville but hey maybe 1 farmville is enough?

The thing is I don't see anything wrong with griefing. Do i grief? no.
I do see things are wrong. You can bring a node from q100 to q10 in 10mins. Try to calculate how long the node needs to come back to q100.

do you think many random player care if some other' dude's node was ruined. nope. so your personal gain must be protected under any cause so that other players can't ever leave vandal scents again is that right?
Who cares about nodes. fuck them . destruction is a natural thing. the remaining nodes will become more valuable. so in the end those who put the most effort in protecting them wins.
Image
User avatar
psyknx
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:58 am

Re: ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Post by psyknx »

naosnule wrote:
psyknx wrote:(...)

I'm pretty sure you can place walls around a player but not around my river clay node.
So only building protection matters? If someone steals from you, find out who it was and wage war.
If you're going to defend your dumb arguments with a new unrelated equally dumb arguments you're doing it wrong.
naosnule
Posts: 394
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 6:18 pm

Re: ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Post by naosnule »

psyknx wrote:
naosnule wrote:
psyknx wrote:(...)

I'm pretty sure you can place walls around a player but not around my river clay node.
So only building protection matters? If someone steals from you, find out who it was and wage war.
If you're going to defend your dumb arguments with a new unrelated equally dumb arguments you're doing it wrong.

Yeah, sorry, I should just have insulted you instead.
User avatar
NaoWhut
Posts: 4852
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: |.

Re: ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Post by NaoWhut »

lol

"Oh, they're vandaling our nodes? BETTER WAGE
WAR BOYS!!!"

-later-

"Nope, they're still waiting for us to only be on as
one person alone outside, they're still all in the
walls / logged off"

"Nope, none of them are using their combat alts
today, nothing to kill, guess i should just make alts
and vandal their node"

-finds them outside-

"Nope, they ran away in a straight line, we'll never
catch them"
ImageImage
naosnule
Posts: 394
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 6:18 pm

Re: ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Post by naosnule »

NaoWhut wrote:lol

"Oh, they're vandaling our nodes? BETTER WAGE
WAR BOYS!!!"

-later-

"Nope, they're still waiting for us to only be on as
one person alone outside, they're still all in the
walls / logged off"

"Nope, none of them are using their combat alts
today, nothing to kill, guess i should just make alts
and vandal their node"
Yes, there is something called "economic warfare". Which would include measures such as vandalizing their nodes.

Of course, with enough organization and manpower, you can actually ram their walls. (Defenders are usally in an advantage though, which is why it takes a far larger effort from the attacking side).

As for catching them: be prepared with more high quality water than they do.
User avatar
NaoWhut
Posts: 4852
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: |.

Re: ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Post by NaoWhut »

naosnule wrote:
NaoWhut wrote:-Sarcasm-
-Missuse of words and uninformed opinion-
You're right! we should do a war of attrition!

Omg you're so smart! they'd run out of water
then right!?
ImageImage
naosnule
Posts: 394
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 6:18 pm

Re: ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Post by naosnule »

NaoWhut wrote:
naosnule wrote:
NaoWhut wrote:-Sarcasm-
-Missuse of words and uninformed opinion-
You're right! we should do a war of attrition!

Omg you're so smart! they'd run out of water
then right!?
I didn't say it would be easy ;).

If they notice that you are not retaliating, then they have no reason to stop using that tactic. Using the threat of mutually assured destruction, you can prevent several such attempts from happening.

Perhaps you find this form of warfare "boring", but my original intent was merely to point out that "huhuhu, let's stop this because it is griefing" is not enough reason.
User avatar
NaoWhut
Posts: 4852
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: |.

Re: ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Post by NaoWhut »

i for one approve of this style of warfare,
it's just easier for them because our peeps
are too lazy to extend the vclaim ^^!

what's a good comeback for someone doing
this!?

Let um, it's what we've done so far, and it
seems to work so far
ImageImage
User avatar
kLauE
Posts: 1085
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:58 am

Re: ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Post by kLauE »

oh the lame war begins
User avatar
Jojjkano
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:23 pm

Re: ADVENTURE DIG Bots Strike Again.

Post by Jojjkano »

What do you expect?
Image

Return to “In Congress Assembled”