-
linkfanpc
- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 7:07 pm
Feasting question
What determines the bonus of hunger and FEPs? With all my tableware i should be getting a 29% hunger modifier but i only get a 57% hunger modifier. What effects it?
jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
randomtelelocxyz wrote:want wish to jorb stop loving gayanal porn
Archipenos wrote:Irl if someone kills me, if I want to burn their house down, nothing but fear of the law or reprisal or my own moral compass stops me.
-
Leafstab
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 12:26 am
- Location: I'm not sure.....
Re: Feasting question
There's reduced effectiveness from having more than one of the same type of object like more than 1 cup/plate and so onlinkfanpc wrote:What determines the bonus of hunger and FEPs? With all my tableware i should be getting a 29% hunger modifier but i only get a 57% hunger modifier. What effects it?

-
linkfanpc
- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 7:07 pm
Re: Feasting question
Ah, i have a wine glass and wooden goblet and a wooden plate and earthenware platter, so they all have reduced effectiveness? Makes much sense, thanks!Leafstab wrote:There's reduced effectiveness from having more than one of the same type of object like more than 1 cup/plate and so onlinkfanpc wrote:What determines the bonus of hunger and FEPs? With all my tableware i should be getting a 29% hunger modifier but i only get a 57% hunger modifier. What effects it?
EDIT: Seems many things still aren't working correctly. With just an earthenware platter, i only get 4% hunger modifier while it's UI says it should give over ten.
jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
randomtelelocxyz wrote:want wish to jorb stop loving gayanal porn
Archipenos wrote:Irl if someone kills me, if I want to burn their house down, nothing but fear of the law or reprisal or my own moral compass stops me.
-
MagicManICT
- Posts: 18435
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am
Re: Feasting question
It's how the math works. It's not 1.00 - x1 - x2 - xN. It's 1.00 * (1.00 - x1) * (1.00 - x2) and so forth. A 10% reduction when you're already at 50% only brings you to 45%. Otherwise, you could easily end up below 0.00 hunger reduction.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.
-
linkfanpc
- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 7:07 pm
Re: Feasting question
Oooooh, that makes way more sense. Thanks bro.MagicManICT wrote:It's how the math works. It's not 1.00 - x1 - x2 - xN. It's 1.00 * (1.00 - x1) * (1.00 - x2) and so forth. A 10% reduction when you're already at 50% only brings you to 45%. Otherwise, you could easily end up below 0.00 hunger reduction.
jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
randomtelelocxyz wrote:want wish to jorb stop loving gayanal porn
Archipenos wrote:Irl if someone kills me, if I want to burn their house down, nothing but fear of the law or reprisal or my own moral compass stops me.
-
LaserSaysPew
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Feasting question
Actually, 10% while being at 50% will bring you to 47.6%, not 45%. It's feasting efficiency. If you have 100% hunger bonus from tableware, you've got 100+100=200% feasting efficiency, which means 100/200=0.5, or 50% hunger. Getting 10% more will mean 100/210=~0,476. Having 200% from tableware will make you get 33.3% hunger from food, 300% - 25% hunger etc.
-
MagicManICT
- Posts: 18435
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am
Re: Feasting question
I knew there was some sort of diminishing returns for adding more objects, I just couldn't remember what it was. Thanks for the follow up. The wiki article is a bit vague on the table and symbel bonuses the last time I read it.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.