Game Development: Burying Roe

Announcements about major changes in Haven & Hearth.
User avatar
Sevenless
Posts: 7704
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:55 am
Location: Canada

Re: Game Development: Burying Roe

Post by Sevenless »

jorb wrote:Forgot this
  • Fixed a bug by which the order of alchemical inputs could matter when determining the negative effects of elixirs. Keep an eye out for these types of bugs.
Added to OP.
Thank you kindly, although this made finding potions easier (you always had two wound options to choose from) it was a real pain in the ass
Lucky: haven is so quirky
Lucky: can be so ugly, can be so heartwarming
Sevenless: it is life

The Art of Herding
W16 Farmer's Almanac
W16 Casting Rod Cheatsheet
Explanation of the logic behind the cooking system
User avatar
dagrimreefah
Posts: 2648
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 3:01 am

Re: Game Development: Burying Roe

Post by dagrimreefah »

plus one
Mr_Bober
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 8:51 pm

Re: Game Development: Burying Roe

Post by Mr_Bober »

jorb wrote:Added "Roe Deer", a type of deer. Males with horns, and females without. Spawn in forests, and some grasslands.
This male / female difference opens up new avenues. I'm guessing males only drop horns. Do they also drop testicles, like domesticated animals do? Do female have a chance to drop Beast Unborn curios? If so, will season affect the chance?

Will this difference be added to other animals we already have like Red Deer, Wild Goats, Mouflons, and Moose? For those animals that don't have very obvious differences (other than size IRL), would different colours be added (like domesticated animals have)?
Will wild Aurochs only give milk (with a clover) if they are females?
Will there be a difference in armor, health, or damage done by male and female animals?

More importantly, would this finally allow us to pick which animals to tame, by knowing their sex before they are fully tamed?
User avatar
Austinh15
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 10:45 pm

Re: Game Development: Burying Roe

Post by Austinh15 »

jorb wrote: Fixed a bug by which the order of alchemical inputs could matter when determining the negative effects of elixirs. Keep an eye out for these types of bugs.[/list]
Finally, my fight is over. I may rest.
Xoatl
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 9:54 pm

Re: Game Development: Burying Roe

Post by Xoatl »

I'm sure many will disagree with me but I think from a purely rational basis quest stones should only be gildable to jewellery (and necklaces should be gildable) while quest leaves should only be for clothes (non jewellery).
User avatar
Sollar
Posts: 561
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: Game Development: Burying Roe

Post by Sollar »

Apparently I cannot inspect a dead walrus for quality. Is this a bug coming with last patch?
TheUltimateC
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2018 10:30 pm

Re: Game Development: Burying Roe

Post by TheUltimateC »

jorb wrote: [*] Nerfed "Go for the Jugular" by switching one of the opening it gives to not be self-reinforcing. Now gives 15% "Cornered" (red) and 10% "Reeling" (yellow) rather than 15% "Off Balance" (green), and 10% "Cornered". Nerfing was insisted upon by certain parties, but I truly do not know if needed, or good. Feel entirely free to talk me out of this and into other changes.
Which nab misspelled kito, lol :p
XXPX1
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 1:10 am
Location: United States

Re: Game Development: Burying Roe

Post by XXPX1 »

Thanks for the update :)
User avatar
r0ck4ev3r
Posts: 282
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 10:30 pm

Re: Game Development: Burying Roe

Post by r0ck4ev3r »

When using non gems in rings you still get the "only gems..." popup but can still gild.
"Don't just have an idea- have all of them." ~ Niv-Mizzet
xingqishi
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2022 4:19 am

Re: Game Development: Burying Roe

Post by xingqishi »

I think there is a sad story after the picture.

Return to “Announcements”