Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Announcements about major changes in Haven & Hearth.
User avatar
Fostik
Posts: 2519
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 4:08 pm
Location: EU

Re: Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Post by Fostik »

jorb wrote:Ok, since armor gilding was controversial(tm) we decided to hold off on it at least for now, to see where the discussion goes if nothing else. Keep opining.

Kept the change by which armor is disabled, rather than destroyed, when reaching 0 HP.

Updated OP to reflect.
Just make them gildable with metal gilds for metal armor, and sewing gilds for all other. Gems are too op to be widely available for gilding in almost all items you can wear, and will segregate playerbase too much.
Known as zunzon. Contact discord: zunzon.
My experience of market building in W13
User avatar
vatas
Posts: 5255
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:34 am
Location: Suomi Finland Perkele

Re: Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Post by vatas »

mulamishne wrote:
jorb wrote:Ok, since armor gilding was controversial(tm) we decided to hold off on it at least for now, to see where the discussion goes if nothing else. Keep opining.
Aight, remove the change to wrecking balls and make them affected by catapult and archery towers.
This suggestion makes so much sense that I had assumed this to be the case already.
Haven and Hearth Wiki (Maintained by volunteers - test/verify when practical. Forum thread

Basic Claim Safety (And what you’re doing wrong
TL:;DR: Build a Palisade with only Visitor gates.)

Combat Guide (Overview, PVE, PVP) (Includes how to escape/minimize risk of getting killed.)
User avatar
loftar
Posts: 9096
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
Location: Your character database

Re: Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Post by loftar »

messiahxD wrote:Is Haven even considered a "sandbox" game if you police the way people siege into other bases? I mean this is just a stupid way to nerf sieging AFTER you already made it harder to raid villages :?
The thing is that the wrecking ball bypasses all the relevant parts of the siege system in order to be a civic mechanic, so it's a bit weird to effectively leave it more powerful than a battering ram. On the flipside, the wrecking ball having these restrictions opens for the possibility to entirely remove its drying time which would make it even nicer for civic use. We didn't want to do that right now, in case there happen to be some sort of bug or oversight with the mechanic, but it was something we considered, and may yet consider for the future.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
User avatar
DonVelD
Posts: 1913
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 12:37 pm
Location: @ your fenced base W/ a boar

Re: Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Post by DonVelD »

Also about the siege changes, I'd be fine with wrecking balls being unusable for raiding but also sieging with the ram is absolutely cancer right now because it encourages heavy amounts of autism on both sides. Just one or two emergency prayers are enough to make the siege absolutely unviable. You either sit there for almost a week or give up. This world is literally a no-siege world.
      Image
      Image
JOIN THE OFFICIAL H&H DISCORD TODAY
User avatar
Sephiron
Posts: 501
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 2:13 am

Re: Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Post by Sephiron »

or what if cap all stats to 200 and make players rely on the rest of their stats from equipment only idk lol not a developer
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
kirillius98
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:52 am

Re: Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Post by kirillius98 »

loftar wrote:
messiahxD wrote:Is Haven even considered a "sandbox" game if you police the way people siege into other bases? I mean this is just a stupid way to nerf sieging AFTER you already made it harder to raid villages :?
The thing is that the wrecking ball bypasses all the relevant parts of the siege system in order to be a civic mechanic, so it's a bit weird to effectively leave it more powerful than a battering ram. On the flipside, the wrecking ball having the mechanic opens for the possibility to entirely remove its drying time which would make it even nicer for civic use. We didn't want to do that right now, in case there happen to be some sort of bug or oversight with the mechanic, but it was something we considered, and may yet consider for the future.
About "civic use" - sounds really good and I wish it could implemented ASAP anda also looking forward for new simple siege engines.
EditDotEXE
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 3:45 am

Re: Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Post by EditDotEXE »

"Made it so that armor, when reaching 0 HP, is disabled, rather than breaking."

Finally don't have to worry about breaking my gilded batwings, wonder if it still stops bats when armor is disabled.
User avatar
Zentetsuken
Posts: 2127
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:07 pm
Location: Flavor Town

Re: Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Post by Zentetsuken »

jorb wrote:Ok, since armor gilding was controversial(tm) we decided to hold off on it at least for now, to see where the discussion goes if nothing else. Keep opining.

Kept the change by which armor is disabled, rather than destroyed, when reaching 0 HP.

Updated OP to reflect.
There is literally no discussion to be had.

Why don't you tell us what the hell you were thinking with this instead?

Do the hundreds of DMs and forum posts you accrue over the months from noobs getting killed by people who crazily oustat and outperform them come anywhere close to the amount of DMs and forum posts you get asking for armor gildings? I'd be willing to bet you get about 1 ask for armor gilding per 1000 asks for the former.

I'm genuinely struggling to even imagine the "dev time conversation" that lead to this. If you guys actually had a discussion about it and both of you came to the conclusion that "this is what the players want" and "it would be cool," then I am genuinely scared and discouraged by the out of touch direction that the development process is steering in.
Last edited by Zentetsuken on Mon Oct 17, 2022 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
      Image
      Image
JOIN THE OFFICIAL H&H DISCORD TODAY

♰ PROUD FORUM MODERATOR 02.01.2024 - 05.10.2024 ♰
User avatar
Clemins
Posts: 434
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 5:33 am
Location: Omicron Persei VIII

Re: Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Post by Clemins »

loftar wrote:
messiahxD wrote:Is Haven even considered a "sandbox" game if you police the way people siege into other bases? I mean this is just a stupid way to nerf sieging AFTER you already made it harder to raid villages :?
The thing is that the wrecking ball bypasses all the relevant parts of the siege system in order to be a civic mechanic, so it's a bit weird to effectively leave it more powerful than a battering ram. On the flipside, the wrecking ball having these restrictions opens for the possibility to entirely remove its drying time which would make it even nicer for civic use. We didn't want to do that right now, in case there happen to be some sort of bug or oversight with the mechanic, but it was something we considered, and may yet consider for the future.
This has literally been the only method that has been worth doing this world. I'm all for spending an unhealthy amount of time playing haven, but having siege in it's current state is so not worth doing. Please reconsidar the siege changes to the world start, make the timer and claim buff way more reasonable. (Just shot in the dark sort of numbers) but instead of tacking on literal days with the claim numens, why not hours? Like come on, would 36 hours max would even be remarkably better than what it currently is.
ImageImage
ImageImageImageImage
Dev's stance on pvp in Haven:
viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44710
EditDotEXE
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 3:45 am

Re: Game Development: Darkwood Gilding

Post by EditDotEXE »

Adata wrote:Hat looks kinda nice but sucks it's the disgusting garlic.
Your use of "sucks" and dislike of garlic is really telling blood sucker.

Return to “Announcements”