Yesc0sm0fen0zepa wrote:But why should those players who spent their time on questing suffer?
-
Halbertz
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 11:03 pm
Re: Prelude: World 16
-
Saigetsu
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 8:43 pm
Re: Prelude: World 16
Totally agreed. Got some chilly times questing this world and got happier and happier when Q of moles, ladybugs and etc. grew up. Now they take my candy from me.Vert wrote:And?overtyped wrote:No, i'm directly saying 99% of the playerbase did not try to increase local quality actively. This is a fact.c0sm0fen0zepa wrote:
It is spreading through the markets, quite actively. The fact that some are so lazy that they don't want to do it, doesn't mean that it should be removed from the game.
i dont see q 1000 item that broke game in w15, why quality increase is removed?
-
Tokmicz
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:34 pm
- Location: the damn lawn
Re: Prelude: World 16
Happy and excited to see the food system changed, the +2 stuff however does seem to defeat the point of the whole thing.
-
Dawidio123
- Posts: 1456
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:48 pm
- Location: In your ear
Re: Prelude: World 16
Ngl, if salt is back to where it was the whole rebalance is pointless lel.Tokmicz wrote:Happy and excited to see the food system changed, the +2 stuff however does seem to defeat the point of the whole thing.
-
Jons
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:26 pm
- Location: Final Evening
Re: Prelude: World 16
thisSlaveboy29 wrote: This is the biggest sign it is typical bad whales crying.
-
Tokmicz
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:34 pm
- Location: the damn lawn
Re: Prelude: World 16
I honestly do hope the salt buff is only slight but if so then salt is still rather pointless, and if buffed too much we're back to where we were. Would be better to change it's mechanic/use (spice??) or remove it altogether.Dawidio123 wrote: Ngl, if salt is back to where it was the whole rebalance is pointless lel.
-
Unfug
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2023 9:26 pm
Re: Prelude: World 16
So this is possible again? just wanted to drop it here again just in case some new player may stumble over it. Imagine being a new player hiding deep in a cave and find the entrance blocked on the next day. Noice.vatas wrote:Just to make sure I understand what Nightdawg and Noindy are talking about... people used to make "leather caves" with filled drying racks and prepped tanning tubs inside, then place a claim in front of the cave entrance to "seal" it? When leather is done, just declaim to "pop the bottle." (Obviously you leave at least one character inside, to move the dry hide into the tubs.)
For this to work, cave system needs to have just one natural entrance - then only practical way to breach it would be to dig a tunnel there, which would cost lots of early metal to do safely/consistently. Especially if the cave is sufficiently isolated from other cave systems. Some caves meet up close enough that you could realistically just get lucky and breach with zero cave-ins.
-
c0sm0fen0zepa
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2021 7:34 am
Re: Prelude: World 16
Halbertz wrote:Yesc0sm0fen0zepa wrote:But why should those players who spent their time on questing suffer?
"Would you like tea or coffee?"
Halbertz :"yes"
-
Tokmicz
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:34 pm
- Location: the damn lawn
Re: Prelude: World 16
Anyway quite happy to see more beekeeping products added in, regardless of their intended use.jorb wrote: [*] This fixed FEP-to-Hunger ratio is maintained even with crafting buffs applied to the food item, with some exceptions made for some crafting buffs which expliclity wish to modify the FEP-to-Hunger ratio, e.g. "Propolis".
-
Halbertz
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 11:03 pm
Re: Prelude: World 16
Yesc0sm0fen0zepa wrote:Halbertz wrote:Yesc0sm0fen0zepa wrote:But why should those players who spent their time on questing suffer?
"Would you like tea or coffee?"
Halbertz :"yes"

