Game Development: Listed Wound

Announcements about major changes in Haven & Hearth.
User avatar
loftar
Posts: 9092
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
Location: Your character database

Re: Game Development: Listed Wound

Post by loftar »

Skrain wrote:Based, fuck people who take premium caps from the spruces. Anyone who supports that is a short sighted cunt, or wants the game to die.
Perhaps to be clear, there are two reasons I haven't done this until now:
  • For one thing, I just hadn't though of giving hat transfers a "grace period" like this until reading about the Steam Marketplace and seeing that that's apparently how they do it. Prior to that, I hadn't thought of a way to prevent forced hat transfers other than to turn off hat transfers altogether, which I suspect wouldn't have been too appreciated.
  • For another thing, my thinking had been that removing forced hat transfers would turn "hat or die" into just "die", and it wasn't necessarily obvious to me that you're better off from just not even having the option. What changed my mind was the realization that it's probably also the case that, with forced hat transfers, wearing a store hat probably also makes you far more likely to be targeted to begin with, and that's probably a situation we want to avoid as far as reasonably possible.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
User avatar
DonVelD
Posts: 1913
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 12:37 pm
Location: @ your fenced base W/ a boar

Re: Game Development: Listed Wound

Post by DonVelD »

Skrain wrote:
DonVelD wrote:People will instantly die now instead of trading a hat for survival, but thats just the consequence, good updoot
Why are you pretending like the people who did this actually spared people?
killing em would be bad for the business, retard
      Image
      Image
JOIN THE OFFICIAL H&H DISCORD TODAY
User avatar
caz
Posts: 542
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 7:27 pm

Re: Game Development: Listed Wound

Post by caz »

8-) cool
Image
User avatar
Avu
Posts: 3000
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:00 pm

Re: Game Development: Listed Wound

Post by Avu »

A step in the right direction. A tiny one though.
"Since all men count themselves righteous, and since
no righteous man raises his hand against the innocent,
a man need only strike another to make him evil."
User avatar
azrid
Posts: 3647
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:33 pm

Re: Game Development: Listed Wound

Post by azrid »

well done
this patch is very impactful
Image
Image
Skrain
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 3:18 am

Re: Game Development: Listed Wound

Post by Skrain »

loftar wrote:
Skrain wrote:Based, fuck people who take premium caps from the spruces. Anyone who supports that is a short sighted cunt, or wants the game to die.
Perhaps to be clear, there are two reasons I haven't done this until now:
  • For one thing, I just hadn't though of giving hat transfers a "grace period" like this until reading about the Steam Marketplace and seeing that that's apparently how they do it. Prior to that, I hadn't thought of a way to prevent forced hat transfers other than to turn off hat transfers altogether, which I suspect wouldn't have been too appreciated.
  • For another thing, my thinking had been that removing forced hat transfers would turn "hat or die" into just "die", and it wasn't necessarily obvious to me that you're better off from just not even having the option. What changed my mind was the realization that it's probably also the case that, with forced hat transfers, wearing a store hat probably also makes you far more likely to be targeted to begin with, and that's probably a situation we want to avoid as far as reasonably possible.
I can understand the hat or die perspective, until you actually think about it for more than a minute.
The argument has always been flawed, acting as if the wild asshole who attacks a literally worthless spurce cap HAS to do it, when in reality those people are going to murder hobo anyone anyway. They just managed to hold you changing this system hostage under the guise of "But for the new players it would be worse!" yeah, because those people are behaving in a way that does that, not because the change. The majority of people doing hat or die are randomly killing spruces anyway, they just enriched themselves by fooling you
User avatar
mulamishne
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 8:35 am

Re: Game Development: Listed Wound

Post by mulamishne »

We have now entered the new era of 'build your hf right here and give me a token or die'

Jokes aside, cool patch :)
irongete
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: Game Development: Listed Wound

Post by irongete »

Are hats at 0% gonna be detected by the Barter Stand red hand?
User avatar
AHONEN
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 10:57 am

Re: Game Development: Listed Wound

Post by AHONEN »

So traders need to wait for a day to confirm that payment with hat is completed?
User avatar
mulamishne
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 8:35 am

Re: Game Development: Listed Wound

Post by mulamishne »

irongete wrote:Are hats at 0% gonna be detected by the Barter Stand red hand?
Great question, curious as well. Seems really bad for honest trade imo.

Also the siege change is fucked, islands are very close to full vault now. Consider making the exclusion zone between water and palisade even further now.
Last edited by mulamishne on Fri Jan 31, 2025 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Return to “Announcements”