Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Ferinex · Post by **Ferinex** » Sat Apr 30, 2022 10:25 pm

Walls should be preferentially targeted by decay, if on a claim, sparing the other things until the wall is decayed first.

VDZ · Post by **VDZ** » Sun May 01, 2022 11:07 am

SnuggleSnail · Post by **SnuggleSnail** » Sun May 01, 2022 12:40 pm

0 authority claims should not protect walls from hand bashing, or at very least act as though it has 0% claim power for siege purposes.

You guys still didn't revert the random ass patch you did in response to me bashing dead realms with visitor that made destroying dead claims a crime / protected by visitor BTW

VDZ wrote:Why?

He wants to loot abandoned willages, but the houses inside and then their cupboards decay faster than the walls.

Nightdawg · Post by **Nightdawg** » Sun May 01, 2022 2:57 pm

Can't you just bash the wall if the claim ran out of auth? Was this changed?

DonVelD · Post by **DonVelD** » Sun May 01, 2022 3:12 pm

Nightdawg wrote:Can't you just bash the wall if the claim ran out of auth? Was this changed?

You can't. You can only bash the wall if its fresh or outside of the claim.

pawnchito · Post by **pawnchito** » Sun May 01, 2022 10:05 pm

DonVelD wrote:
Nightdawg wrote:Can't you just bash the wall if the claim ran out of auth? Was this changed?
You can't. You can only bash the wall if its fresh or outside of the claim.

seems kinda lame.

DonVelD · Post by **DonVelD** » Sun May 01, 2022 10:11 pm

pawnchito wrote: seems kinda lame.

Because it is! No idea why it's like that.

SnuggleSnail wrote:0 authority claims should not protect walls from hand bashing, or at very least act as though it has 0% claim power for siege purposes.

+1

Post by **vatas** » Mon May 02, 2022 6:49 am

To my knowledge, inactive claim should remove Palisade's hand-bashing immunity. It still has 25 soak though, making bashing only option for big bois. (Or very least, 729 is a tall-order for someone starting with fresh character only.)

(btw, I have false memory that Jorb lowered the Palisade's max soak in a patch that made it hand-bash immune when it reaches it's full soak, but I haven't found any proof of this. Making it a real thing could be a decent idea.)

delfer8 · Post by **delfer8** » Tue May 03, 2022 5:45 pm

Why would a decay mechanic favour raiders and looters

Its cool to get free stuff but the thing is: why whould a game decay mechanic help a kind of player choice?

DonVelD · Post by **DonVelD** » Tue May 03, 2022 5:53 pm

vatas wrote:To my knowledge, inactive claim should remove Palisade's hand-bashing immunity. It still has 25 soak though, making bashing only option for big bois. (Or very least, 729 is a tall-order for someone starting with fresh character only.)

It's not the case unfortunately.

Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Re: Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Re: Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Re: Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Re: Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Re: Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Re: Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Re: Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Re: Walls on a claim should decay preferentially

Re: Walls on a claim should decay preferentially