omg you people. All a claim means conceptually is that someone has set up a watch on that area and can track people who go into it or do things in it.
"Tresspassing" on a claim is not an evil, anti-carebear action. All it means is you leave a scent. It shouldn't really be called a criminal action.
IMO keep the change, there is nothing wrong with claiming water.
-
Tamalak
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:31 am
-
Amanda44
- Posts: 6485
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:13 pm
Re: Can't pass River if personal claim on it?
No-one is saying not to claim water - just to go back to not leaving scents when crossing it in a boat, which is the way it has always been, any scent can be used for tracking which includes the lowly trespass scent.
Also ... OMG you ppl!
Also ... OMG you ppl!
Koru wrote:
It is like in Lord of the Flies, nobody controlls what is going on in the hearthlands, those weaker and with conscience are just fucked.
Avatar made by Jordan.
Animal lovers - Show us your pets! - viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44444#p577254
It is like in Lord of the Flies, nobody controlls what is going on in the hearthlands, those weaker and with conscience are just fucked.
Avatar made by Jordan.
Animal lovers - Show us your pets! - viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44444#p577254
-
boreial
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:02 am
- Location: Smack dab in the middle of NoWhere
Re: Can't pass River if personal claim on it?
just saying thanks to jorb, for considering changing it back to no trespass in a boat when crossing a claim while on water.
