Remove Charter Stone limitation from Outlaw

[Astarisk]

Let's be realistic here, between multi-layered villagers, mines, caves, alt villages, ally villages etc etc. You have plenty of places to hide a scented character. A total lock down of a scented character isn't possible, this outlaw debuff is just a hindrance and encourages alt play.

[Kaios]

this outlaw debuff is just a hindrance and encourages alt play.

In some sense yes it does encourage alt use but I also think there are other scenarios where the defender wouldn't want a scented character able to use a charter stone such as when the attackers raid their village and could just make use of the charter stone available in the defender village to port out all the loot.

[Colin500]

Make it so people can port with charter stones but
If a person is in party and someone in the party is aggroed > you get debuff and can't port
Also make it so that you can party only the people you see. ( give buff for fresh non-inherited characters that they can use party through kin menu for few hours )
^ so if you port you need to find the person who's in danger for example.

[VDZ]

With the new siege mechanics, if the problem is people moving loot and criminals out of a village under attack, why not just disable Charter Stones when the vclaim shield or a pclaim shield in the village is damaged?

Also make it so that you can party only the people you see. ( give buff for fresh non-inherited characters that they can use party through kin menu for few hours )

This would screw over tons of unrelated players. I spent all of early world 8 constantly partied with people living so far away from me that we never were able to meet up. Partying is great for chatting with a group of people not in your village and not close to you.

[Colin500]

That's the point where jorbtar could add a special group chat that doesn't allow you map spying on others

[Delamore]

If a person is in party and someone in the party is aggroed > you get debuff and can't port

Do you mean village instead of party? otherwise I don't understand why you would be in a party with someone if this is a risk

[Colin500]

If a person is in party and someone in the party is aggroed > you get debuff and can't port

Do you mean village instead of party? otherwise I don't understand why you would be in a party with someone if this is a risk

Well I mean you couldn't port with charter stone

[Raffeh]

With the new siege mechanics, if the problem is people moving loot and criminals out of a village under attack, why not just disable Charter Stones when the vclaim shield or a pclaim shield in the village is damaged?

This is a good idea. but pclaim doesnt have a sheild? only thing i see wrong with this. i mean something along these lines would do it though. it would allow people to port in but not port out and stop people hearthing between vaults etc.

[ChildhoodObesity]

i thought sieges werent a thing this world anyway, i mean take a look at this cool thread: viewtopic.php?f=40&t=47501 porting away chars during sieges shouldnt even be considered a problem, since sieges arent a thing! now we need outlaw porting xD