Charter stones

[Granger]

One thing I would add is that the load shall be consumed on both sides, which would lead to spawning on a charter no longer being free.

What is purpose?

Make incoming-only charters at trading hubs and alts non-free.

[Ysh]

One thing I would add is that the load shall be consumed on both sides, which would lead to spawning on a charter no longer being free.

What is purpose?

Make incoming-only charters at trading hubs and alts non-free.

Well yes, this will happens from it obviously. But I mean what is justification? Is it somehow too powerful for this to be free? You think travel is right now too easy? What is impetus to your suggesting.

[Granger]

Charter teleport is 100% safe and uninterruptible, quite some argued that it should go away becuse of this.

To have 'fuel' cost on both ends makes just more sense for my suspension of disbelief: use the thingy in whatever way and it'll cost.
Also same reasoning why I'm for decay of gear through useage: to create a sink for stuff and a reason for trade.

[shubla]

a reason for trade.

With charter stones being.. Cheaper..
Trading might get more common?
These days you dont really trade with anyone else than your very close neighbours. If even them.

[vatas]

If Charter Stone would consume charges when people travel to it, possibility of griefing one's stone empty of charges emerges. However it shouldn't be too much of a problem since griefer would have to spend equivalent amount of charges to deplete target's Charter Stone.

One possibility would be that Charter stone used to travel from consumes x*3 charges while destination stone consumes x charges, making griefing even more unfeasible.

I've been working under assumption that most of the time people would use their stone (and precious charges they've managed to scrape off) to travel into Tradehub and then travel to their Hearthfire.

[LadyGoo]

If Charter Stone would consume charges when people travel to it, possibility of griefing one's stone empty of charges emerges. However it shouldn't be too much of a problem since griefer would have to spend equivalent amount of charges to deplete target's Charter Stone.

One possibility would be that Charter stone used to travel from consumes x*3 charges while destination stone consumes x charges, making griefing even more unfeasible. .

just port from the charter you want to grief then.

[shubla]

If Charter Stone would consume charges when people travel to it, possibility of griefing one's stone empty of charges emerges. However it shouldn't be too much of a problem since griefer would have to spend equivalent amount of charges to deplete target's Charter Stone.

One possibility would be that Charter stone used to travel from consumes x*3 charges while destination stone consumes x charges, making griefing even more unfeasible. .

just port from the charter you want to grief then.

One possibility is that instead of using crystals to load stone. You would need crystals in your inventory that would have certain amount of charges. These charges are consumed upon on each use.

[vatas]

Strange crystal could be single use at q10, 2 at q40 and so on. Rock Crystal should be either dedicated for gilding or as charges so I suggest you can ship off x shards from rock crystal that have y amount of charges in each. Chipping first shard from rock crystal would result in <adjective that describes un-pristine condition> Rock Crystal that can't be used in gilding, only chipped further.

[stya]

These days you dont really trade with anyone else than your very close neighbours. If even them.

What do you know about trading this world, please elaborate?

[MadNomad]

One thing I would add is that the load shall be consumed on both sides, which would lead to spawning on a charter no longer being free.

What is purpose?

Make incoming-only charters at trading hubs and alts non-free.

Really?

http://ringofbrodgar.com/wiki/Wilderness_Beacon

some shit q clay and blocks is nothing so it IS free