loftar wrote:Avu wrote:STOCKPILES FIRST THEN YOU CAN FUCK WITH SIGNS! kthnxbye
You mean so that the current containers are obsoleted entirely? :)
hahahaha-no
loftar wrote:Avu wrote:STOCKPILES FIRST THEN YOU CAN FUCK WITH SIGNS! kthnxbye
You mean so that the current containers are obsoleted entirely? :)
loftar wrote:Avu wrote:STOCKPILES FIRST THEN YOU CAN FUCK WITH SIGNS! kthnxbye
You mean so that the current containers are obsoleted entirely?
loftar wrote:It seems my point didn't quite make it across.
When Avu just says "stockpile", it sounds to me like a general object which stores any amount of anything; which would, obviously, make all other containers obsolete. In order for that not to happen, it would be necessary to limit what a "stockpile" could stockpile, and (possibly) also the amount of it. My point was to invite discussion about what kind of such limitations would be reasonable.
loftar wrote:It seems my point didn't quite make it across.
When Avu just says "stockpile", it sounds to me like a general object which stores any amount of anything; which would, obviously, make all other containers obsolete.
loftar wrote:It seems my point didn't quite make it across. :)
When Avu just says "stockpile", it sounds to me like a general object which stores any amount of anything; which would, obviously, make all other containers obsolete. In order for that not to happen, it would be necessary to limit what a "stockpile" could stockpile, and (possibly) also the amount of it. My point was to invite discussion about what kind of such limitations would be reasonable.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests