I think devs stated that decay in cave is supposed to be 1/10th of the decay above ground, I feel like it is much larger. I have built a few dozen objects in cave, and some of them have already decayed, many of them have taken some damage.
Is the speed reall 1/10th of speed above ground or is there some bug or such?
-
shubla
- Posts: 13041
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:26 am
- Location: Finland
Cave decay intended?
I'm not sure that I have a strong argument against sketch colors - Jorb, November 2019
http://i.imgur.com/CRrirds.png?1
Join the moderated unofficial discord for the game! https://discord.gg/2TAbGj2
Purus Pasta, The Best Client
-
Granger
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:00 pm
Re: Cave decay intended?
Build a claim? Apart from that, what I see with my stuff that I have stashed away in a cave... decay seems to be within reason.
⁎ Mon Mar 22, 2010 ✝ Thu Jan 23, 2020
-
Ardennesss
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:22 pm
Re: Cave decay intended?
Are you sure they decayed or did you get robbed?
-
MagicManICT
- Posts: 18435
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:47 am
Re: Cave decay intended?
Probably actively working in the area, in and out and such, and so decay is able to proc on a regular basis vs what we typically see in inactive areas that hardly get touched by decay.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.
-
loftar
- Posts: 9096
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am
- Location: Your character database
Re: Cave decay intended?
That is at least supposed to be fixed.MagicManICT wrote:Probably actively working in the area, in and out and such, and so decay is able to proc on a regular basis vs what we typically see in inactive areas that hardly get touched by decay.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
